Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 83

Full-Text Articles in Law

Property Vs. Political Holdouts. The Case Of The Tgv Rail Line Lyon-Budapest In Italy, Livia C. Navone Dec 2009

Property Vs. Political Holdouts. The Case Of The Tgv Rail Line Lyon-Budapest In Italy, Livia C. Navone

Livia C. Navone

While the law and economics literature commonly justifies the takings power on the ground that it is necessary to overcome holdouts and, thus, allow efficient development projects to move forward, this paper shows that the standard theory is highly incomplete. It conveniently ignores the ability of politically powerful groups to block development projects by exercising their de facto veto power over proposed projects. Such groups do not necessarily have rights in any properties directly affected by the project. Consequently, once these groups, which I label “political holdouts,” are added to the analysis, it becomes clear that the payment of just …


Stopping For Death: Re-Framing Our Perspective On The End Of Life, Ruth C. Stern, J. Herbie Difonzo Dec 2009

Stopping For Death: Re-Framing Our Perspective On The End Of Life, Ruth C. Stern, J. Herbie Difonzo

J. Herbie DiFonzo

How we die is increasingly becoming a matter of law and public policy. We grapple with issues of patient autonomy, the proper parameters of doctor-patient discussions on the end of life, the right to hasten death, and the right to control our own medical treatment. But it is physicians and patients, not judges and legislators, who are the principal actors in events at the end of life. Palliative medicine is just beginning to probe the multi-dimensional totality of suffering in dying and seriously ill patients. What we learn will influence our options at the end of life and tell us …


Down The Rabbit Hole: The Madness Of State Film Incentives As As "Solution" To Runaway Production, Adrian H. Mcdonald Nov 2009

Down The Rabbit Hole: The Madness Of State Film Incentives As As "Solution" To Runaway Production, Adrian H. Mcdonald

Adrian H. McDonald

This working paper is a "sequel" to my first law review article on runaway productions called "Through the Looking Glass": Runaway Productions and "Hollywood Economics," published in The University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law in August 2007.

Since 2007, there has been a race to the bottom as virtually every state has enacted significant, if not detrimentally generous, tax incentives to lure film and television production. The efficacy of these incentives is evaluated at length, with particular attention paid to the origin and implementation of tax incentives in California, Massachusetts and Louisiana - states with colorful backgrounds …


The Supreme Court's Assault On Litigation: Why (And How) It Might Be A Good Thing For Health Law, Abigail R. Moncrieff Nov 2009

The Supreme Court's Assault On Litigation: Why (And How) It Might Be A Good Thing For Health Law, Abigail R. Moncrieff

Abigail R. Moncrieff

In recent years, the Supreme Court has narrowed or eliminated private rights of action in many legal regimes, much to the chagrin of the legal academy. That trend has had a significant impact on health law; the Court’s decisions have eliminated the private enforcement mechanism for at least three important healthcare regimes: Medicaid, employer-sponsored insurance, and medical devices. In a similar trend outside the courts, state legislatures have capped noneconomic and punitive damages for medical malpractice litigation, weakening the tort system’s deterrent capacity in those states. This Article points out that the trend of eliminating private rights of action in …


Listening To Indigenous Voices: What The Un Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples Means For U.S. Tribes, Aliza G. Organick Oct 2009

Listening To Indigenous Voices: What The Un Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples Means For U.S. Tribes, Aliza G. Organick

Aliza G. Organick

When the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in September, 2009, it was heralded as a major victory for all of the world’s Indigenous Peoples, as well as international human rights. This remarkable effort took over two decades to come to fruition and recognizes that Indigenous Peoples worldwide continue to suffer from the dispossession of their lands and resources and that existing human rights documents did not do enough to protect those rights. The Declaration not only reaffirms the basic human rights recognized in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, …


State Authority To Regulate Toxins In Children's Consumer Products, Doug Farquhar Oct 2009

State Authority To Regulate Toxins In Children's Consumer Products, Doug Farquhar

Doug Farquhar

The rapid rise over the last several years in the number of recalled children's toys along with media coverage of foreign-manufactured products containing lead and other toxins created a public groundswell demanding stricter controls on toys and other children's products. In response, lawmakers have tightened existing toy safety standards, increased enforcement capability of state and federal authorities, and expanded the number of regulated substances, first by state lawmakers, followed by Congress with the enactment of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008. This article explores the extent to which the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 preempts existing …


A Defense Of Stem Cell Research, Gregory Dolin Oct 2009

A Defense Of Stem Cell Research, Gregory Dolin

Gregory Dolin

Isolation of human embryonic stem cells in 1998 simultaneously caused great excitement and concern in the scientific community and the population at large. The great promises that the discovery held were viewed with suspicion by many, because the isolation of these stem cells involved destruction of an embryo, and thus, according to some, destruction of innocent human life. Full ten years later, the debate still rages. The present Article proposes a solution to this debate.The solution concedes that the embryo is a human being entitled to full moral protection. Having made that concession, however, the Article proceeds to argue that …


An Overview Of Tolls To Statutes Of Limitations On Account Of War: Are They Current And Relevant In The Post-September 11th Era?, Hon. Mark Dillon Sep 2009

An Overview Of Tolls To Statutes Of Limitations On Account Of War: Are They Current And Relevant In The Post-September 11th Era?, Hon. Mark Dillon

Hon. Mark C. Dillon

The devastation of the attacks that occurred at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 included costly disruption to the operation of courts in the City and State of New York. A court facility at Five World Trade Center was destroyed. Attorneys were among the 2,752 persons killed in the event. Law offices were destroyed. Key litigation witnesses and documents were lost forever. Thousands of attorneys were unable to access their work for days. State courts in Manhattan did not reopen for business until September 17, 2001. Amidst the turmoil and confusion, there was a defined set of potential …


No Reparations Without Taxation, Carlton Waterhouse, Andre Smith Sep 2009

No Reparations Without Taxation, Carlton Waterhouse, Andre Smith

Carlton Waterhouse

ABSTRACT In the article, Professors Andre Smith and Carlton Waterhouse explore the interesting and rich relationship between reparations and the tax law scholarship. Employing a rich dialogical style, the authors move fluidly between the theoretical and practical aspects of both reparations and tax law in a way that brings both areas of research together. Beyond the slavery reparations tax scams of the earlier part of the decade, the authors reveal an intriguing and important relationship between reparations and the United States tax code previously unexplored. The authors accomplish this in two distinct ways. They begin with an examination of reparations …


Racial Profiling In America, April J. Walker Sep 2009

Racial Profiling In America, April J. Walker

April J. Walker

No abstract provided.


Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention To Failings Of Judicial Impartiality, Jeffrey W. Stempel Sep 2009

Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention To Failings Of Judicial Impartiality, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Jeffrey W Stempel

In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., 129 S. Ct. 2252 (2009), the Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote vacated and remanded a decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in which Justice Brent Benjamin cast the deciding vote in favor of Massey, a company run by Don Blankenship, who had provided $3 million in support to Benjamin during his 2004 election campaign.

Despite the unsavory taste of the entire episode, the Court was excessively careful not to criticize Justice Benjamin. Overlooked because of this undue judicial civility and controversy about the constitutional aspects of the decision …


Administrative Law In The Roberts Court: The First Four Years, Robin K. Craig Sep 2009

Administrative Law In The Roberts Court: The First Four Years, Robin K. Craig

Robin K. Craig

Given Justice David Souter’s retirement in the summer of 2009, the four U.S. Supreme Court terms that began in October 2005 and ended in June 2009 constitute a first distinct phase of the Roberts Court. During those first four terms, moreover, the Court decided a number of cases relevant to the practice and structure of administrative law.

This Article provides a comprehensive survey and summary of the Supreme Court’s administrative-law-related decisions issued during this first phase of the Roberts Court. It organizes those decisions into three categories. Part I of this Article discusses the Supreme Court decisions that affect access …


Our Forgotten Founders: Reconstruction, Public Education, And Constitutional Heroism, Thomas G. Donnelly Sep 2009

Our Forgotten Founders: Reconstruction, Public Education, And Constitutional Heroism, Thomas G. Donnelly

Thomas G Donnelly

This Article examines a set of constitutional stories that has not been the subject of focused study by legal scholars—the stories we tell our schoolchildren about the Founding and Reconstruction. These stories offer new clues about the background assumptions that elite lawyers, political leaders, and the wider public bring to bear when they consider the meaning of the Constitution. Since the early twentieth century, our leading high school textbooks have tended to praise the Founding generation and canonize certain “Founding Fathers,” while, at the same time, largely ignoring Reconstruction’s key players and underemphasizing the constitutional revolution these “Forgotten Founders” envisioned …


Medellin, The President’S Foreign Affairs Power And Domestic Law, Arthur M. Weisburd Sep 2009

Medellin, The President’S Foreign Affairs Power And Domestic Law, Arthur M. Weisburd

Arthur M. Weisburd

In this article, Professor Weisburd explores the implications of Medellín v. Texas for the President’s authority to affect domestic law through reliance on his authority to conduct the foreign affairs of the United States. He argues that the Court was correct to reject arguments that, on the facts of the case, the President could look to a delegation of authority from Congress or from the Senate as treaty-maker, or that President could treat the matter as resting on his power to settle claims against foreign governments, or that the President’s obligation to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” …


Change Is Needed; How Latinos Are Affected By The United States Criminal Justice System, Christopher F. Bagnato Sep 2009

Change Is Needed; How Latinos Are Affected By The United States Criminal Justice System, Christopher F. Bagnato

Christopher F. Bagnato

Latinos have been present in this country for centuries. They slowly have been making their mark in the communities of this country, usually seen but not really heard or noticed. Yet during the past thirty years the amount of Latino immigrants has skyrocketed. Census projections indicate that Latinos will be the biggest minority population in this county in the near future. The issues with discrimination of Latinos started on the streets with phrases like, “racial profiling” and “driving while brown,” and have moved into new places like the courtroom. Latinos have had to face not only the burden of prejudice …


Thwack!! Take That, User-Generated Content!: Marvel Enterprises, Inc. V. Ncsoft Corp., Carl M. Szabo Aug 2009

Thwack!! Take That, User-Generated Content!: Marvel Enterprises, Inc. V. Ncsoft Corp., Carl M. Szabo

Carl M Szabo

Dear Madam or Sir: As seen in the attached note, I am to make two contributions. First, I address the issue of copyright liability of websites for infringement by the website users. A constant struggle as old as the constitution itself, the issue of copyright protection now makes its way into the virtual world of the internet. While the issue of copyright liability has been seen in hundreds of comments and notes from courts and attorneys alike, the issue of copyright liability on the internet remains an open question that if not addressed could endanger the protection afforded to authors …


The Final Frontier: Incorporating Aspects Of Culture And History In The Formation Of A Workable, Legal Framework For Outer Space, Brett S. Janos Aug 2009

The Final Frontier: Incorporating Aspects Of Culture And History In The Formation Of A Workable, Legal Framework For Outer Space, Brett S. Janos

Brett S. Janos

No abstract provided.


Youngstown’S Fourth Tier. Is There Zone Of Insight Beyond The Zone Of Twilight?, Josh Blackman, Elizabeth Bahr Aug 2009

Youngstown’S Fourth Tier. Is There Zone Of Insight Beyond The Zone Of Twilight?, Josh Blackman, Elizabeth Bahr

Josh Blackman

Justice Jackson’s tripartite analysis in Youngstown Sheet & Tube serves as the seminal framework to resolve national security and separation of powers issues. Examining national security and separation of powers cases that have employed the flexible and functionalist Youngstown framework yields a curious, and previously unidentified revelation. This article addresses this irregularity, and explains how in fact the Supreme Court has adopted an implied fourth tier of Youngstown. In some cases, the Supreme Court ostensibly applied the Youngstown framework, yet the Court’s analysis cannot be reasonably pigeonholed into one of the three tiers. Thus, the Court has implicitly recognized a …


A Civic Critique Of Democracy: Civic Organizing As The Generating Force Of A Civic Concept Of Law, Palma Joy Strand Aug 2009

A Civic Critique Of Democracy: Civic Organizing As The Generating Force Of A Civic Concept Of Law, Palma Joy Strand

palma joy strand

A Civic Critique of Democracy: Civic Organizing as the Generating Force of a Civic Concept of Law Palma Joy Strand ABSTRACT Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s controversial “wise Latina” comment embodies the view that law is socially constructed—that “we” make it and that it thus may vary according to who “we” are. Current theories of “popular constitutionalism,” “democratic constitutionalism,” and “demosprudence” take this several steps further and begin to explore the idea that the “we” that makes constitutional law is not just judges but society more broadly. These theories matter because they envision an active role for citizens in law creation, but …


Judging In Bad Faith, Eric J. Miller Aug 2009

Judging In Bad Faith, Eric J. Miller

Eric J. Miller

Must judges apply the law “sincerely” or “in good faith?” H.L.A Hart famously argued that, if legal officials are to require conformity to the law from its subjects, they must accept the law as valid. Hart, however, stopped short of demanding that the personal motivations of legal officials match their public utterances.

In this article, I argue that a judge may be motivated to decide cases for reasons that have nothing to do with the law. Accordingly, the law is systematically de-centered from her calculation of how to decide. Legal norms operate only to constrain or justify her independently motivated …


Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks Aug 2009

Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks

Jennifer S. Hendricks

This Article explores equality-based arguments for abortion rights, revealing both their necessity and their pitfalls. It first uses the narrowness of the “health exception” to abortion regulations to show why equality arguments are needed—because our legal tradition's conception of liberty is based on male experience, and we have no theory of basic human rights grounded in women's reproductive experiences. Next, however, the Article shows that equality arguments, although necessary, can undermine women's reproductive freedom because they require that pregnancy and abortion be analogized to male experiences. The result is that equality arguments focus on either the bodily or the social …


Reason And Reasonableness In Review Of Agency Decisions, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski Aug 2009

Reason And Reasonableness In Review Of Agency Decisions, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski

Jeffrey A Pojanowski

Provisions of federal statutes often incorporate common law terms and concepts. Federal courts interpreting these provisions usually do not look to the law of any particular jurisdiction, but rather apply general rules and principles of the common law. Federal agencies also administer statutes with embedded common law, and it is unclear how much respect, if any, reviewing courts should give to agency interpretations of those incorporated rules and principles. This Article examines this problem with the aim of situating deference doctrine in broader debates about the character of legal reasoning. Drawing on both common law theory and institutional analysis, this …


A Popular Approach To Popular Constitutionalism: The First Amendment, Civic Education, And Constitutional Change, Thomas G. Donnelly Aug 2009

A Popular Approach To Popular Constitutionalism: The First Amendment, Civic Education, And Constitutional Change, Thomas G. Donnelly

Thomas G Donnelly

Popular constitutionalists often ignore one of the most important features of popular constitutional culture—the constitutional life of the average citizen. Although these scholars have detailed the key role played by non-judicial actors in promoting non-Article V constitutional change, they have spent little time considering how changes to constitutional meaning become part of our popular constitutional fabric. This Article fills a gap in the literature by examining how popular constitutional meaning is shaped “on the ground,” once the most recent controversy fades and constitutional life returns to normal. To that end, it focuses on a pathway that has been largely ignored …


Lessons For Social Scientists And Politicians: An Analysis Of Welfare Reform, Jasmin Sethi Aug 2009

Lessons For Social Scientists And Politicians: An Analysis Of Welfare Reform, Jasmin Sethi

Jasmin Sethi

Despite soaring unemployment and the worst economic crisis in decades, 18 states cut their welfare rolls last year, and nationally the number of people receiving cash assistance remained at or near the lowest in more than 40 years. Escalating unemployment coupled with the impending expiration of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) in 2010, will bring renewed attention to welfare reform. This Article examines the effects of President Clinton’s Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 and in particular, evaluates how social science interacted with politics to culminate in the enactment of the PRWORA. It explicates several …


Lessons For Social Scientists And Politicians: An Analysis Of Welfare Reform, Jasmin Sethi Aug 2009

Lessons For Social Scientists And Politicians: An Analysis Of Welfare Reform, Jasmin Sethi

Jasmin Sethi

Despite soaring unemployment and the worst economic crisis in decades, 18 states cut their welfare rolls last year, and nationally the number of people receiving cash assistance remained at or near the lowest in more than 40 years. Escalating unemployment coupled with the impending expiration of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) in 2010, will bring renewed attention to welfare reform. This Article examines the effects of President Clinton’s Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 and in particular, evaluates how social science interacted with politics to culminate in the enactment of the PRWORA. It explicates several …


Prioritizing Justice: Combating Corporate Crime From Task Force To Top Priority, Mary K. Ramirez Aug 2009

Prioritizing Justice: Combating Corporate Crime From Task Force To Top Priority, Mary K. Ramirez

mary k ramirez

Inadequate law enforcement against corporate criminals appears to have created perverse incentives leading to an economic crisis – this time in the context of the subprime mortgage crisis. Prioritizing Justice proposes institutional reform at the Department of Justice in pursuing corporate crime. Presently, corporate crime is pursued nationally primarily through the DOJ Corporate Fraud Task Force and other task forces, the DOJ Criminal Division Fraud Section, and the individual U.S. Attorney’s Offices. Rather than a collection of ad hoc task forces that seek to coordinate policy among a vast array of offices and agencies, the relentless waves of corporate criminality …


The Rights Question, Bruce A. Antkowiak Aug 2009

The Rights Question, Bruce A. Antkowiak

Bruce A Antkowiak

The problem this article addresses will be well known to anyone who has taught or taken a course in Constitutional Law in the last three decades. When the subject turns to the related issues of selective incorporation, substantive due process and the proper interpretation of the Ninth Amendment, teachers of Constitutional Law cringe at the prospect of trying to explain sensibly what the Supreme Court itself has come to acknowledge is a most baffling conundrum: what are “rights,” where do they come from, are there more to be identified in the Constitutional universe, who is equipped to find them, and …


Fair Termination In An At-Will World, Rachel S. Arnow-Richman Aug 2009

Fair Termination In An At-Will World, Rachel S. Arnow-Richman

Rachel S. Arnow-Richman

This Article proposes a fundamental shift in the movement to reform employment termination law. For forty years, there has been a near consensus among employee advocates and worklaw scholars that the current doctrine of employment at will should be abandoned in favor of a rule requiring just cause for termination. This Article contends that such calls are misguided, not (as defenders of the current regime have argued) because a just cause rule grants workers too much protection vis-à-vis management, but because it grant them too little. A just cause rule provides only a weak cause of action to a narrow …


Tailoring Deference To Variety With A Wink And A Nod To Chevron: The Roberts Court And The Amorphous Judicial Framework For Review Of Agency Interpretations Of Law, J. Lyn Entrikin Goering Aug 2009

Tailoring Deference To Variety With A Wink And A Nod To Chevron: The Roberts Court And The Amorphous Judicial Framework For Review Of Agency Interpretations Of Law, J. Lyn Entrikin Goering

J. Lyn Entrikin Goering

In the 25 years since the Court issued its venerable opinion in Chevron, the Supreme Court has all but disregarded the judicial review provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), first enacted in 1946. From 1984 to 2000, Chevron took center stage as the most-cited opinion in administrative law. Beginning in 2000, the Rehnquist Court issued a series of decisions limiting the reach of Chevron. At the same time, the Court revived common law deference frameworks that predate the APA. Yet the Rehnquist Court failed to fully reconcile Chevron with its previous common law deference doctrines and with the APA’s …


Completing Caperton And Clarifying Common Sense Through Using The Right Standard For Constitutional Judicial Recusal, Jeffrey W. Stempel Aug 2009

Completing Caperton And Clarifying Common Sense Through Using The Right Standard For Constitutional Judicial Recusal, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Jeffrey W Stempel

In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a state supreme court decision in which a justice who had received $3 million in campaign support from a company CEO cast the deciding vote to relieve the company of a $50 million liability. The Caperton majority adopted a “probability of bias” standard for constitutional due process review of judicial disqualification decisions that differs from the ordinary “reasonable question as to impartiality” standard for recusal. Four dissenters objected to the majority’s limited supervision of state court disqualification practice, minimized the danger of biased judging presented by the …