Law Commons^™

Evolving Christian Attitudes Towards Personal And National Self-Defense, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

This Article analyzes the changes in orthodox Christian attitudes towards defensive violence. While the Article begins in the 19th century and ends in the 21st, most of the Article is about the 20th century. The Article focuses on American Catholicism and on the Vatican, although there is some discussion of American Protestantism.

In the nineteenth and early in the twentieth centuries, the traditional Christian concepts of Just War and of the individual's duty to use force to defend himself and his family remained uncontroversial, as they had been for centuries.

Disillusionment over World War I turned many Catholics and Protestants …

Defending Weak States Against The "Unwilling Or Unable" Doctrine Of Self-Defense, Dawood I. Ahmed

Dawood Ahmed

Victim states occasionally use force to target non-state actors that have allegedly attacked the victim state, on the pretext that the host state is “unwilling or unable” (“ineffective”) to act. The international law permissibility of such force is unclear: state responsibility principles do not hold ineffective states liable, the universe of state practice is small and the International Court of Justice and some scholars deny the legality of such force while others disagree. This article is the first dedicated to a critical analysis of the “unwilling or unable” doctrine from both, a law and policy perspective. It argues that, although …

“Stand Your Ground” Laws And Justice: The Controversy Over Immunity To Criminal Prosecution, Talon R. Hurst

Talon R Hurst

“Stand Your Ground” laws have received a plethora of media attention in 2012, none of which have been in a positive light. These laws providing a person with immunity from criminal prosecution are now being scrutinized for their confusing nature. “Stand Your Ground” laws allow a person to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, when specific requirements are met. These laws intend for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and others without fear of being criminally prosecuted. However, they often don not provide consistent guidelines to enforce and apply the immunity. Therefore, two persons …

Going Medieval: Targeted Killing, Self-Defense, And The Jus Ad Bellum Regime, Craig Martin

Craig Martin

The U.S. targeted killing policy employs drone-launched missiles to kill suspected terrorists and insurgents in countries in which the U.S. is not clearly involved in an armed conflict. It has justified the program on two bases: that the U.S. is in an armed conflict with Al Qaeda and associated organizations; and that the U.S. can engage in the strikes as an exercise of self-defence. These strikes constitute a use of force against the states in which the targets are located, in jus ad bellum terms, and the claim to the right of self-defence is similarly reliance upon a jus ad …

Targeting Anwar Al-Aulaqi: A Case Study In U.S. Drone Strikes And Targeted Killings, Benjamin R. Farley

Benjamin R Farley

Anwar al-Aulaqi is a natural born American citizen of Yemeni descent who was reportedly added to U.S. targeted killing lists in early 2010. The United States argues that al-Aulaqi is a lawful target due either to his role in an ongoing armed conflict between the United States and Al Qaeda or under the auspices of self-defense. In fact, the United States relies on self-defense and armed conflict in general to justify the lawfulness of its targeted killing programs. When applicable, each of these frameworks provides legal authority for a state to use force against an individual. However, neither framework provides …

Fictitious States, Effective Control, And The Use Of Force, Brian C. Finucane

Brian C Finucane

This Article examines state practice relating to violent non-state actors operating from “fictitious” states. Fictitious states are entities that possess international legal personality but not effective control over their territories and populations. As the Article explains, many of the world’s states are legal fictions. Although the problem is most vividly illustrated by the United States’ recent military strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the problem is far broader. This Article shows that the security threat posed by non-state actors operating from ungoverned territory is not new. Lapses in state control have been common throughout history and violent non-state actors have …

Fictitious States, Effective Control, And The Use Of Force, Brian C. Finucane

Brian C Finucane

This Article examines state practice relating to violent non-state actors operating from “fictitious” states. Fictitious states are entities that possess international legal personality but not effective control over their territories and populations. As the Article explains, many of the world’s states are legal fictions. Although the threat is most vividly illustrated by the United States’ recent military strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the problem is far broader. This Article shows that the security threat posed by non-state actors operating from ungoverned territory is not new. Lapses of state control over territory have been common throughout history and violent non-state …

Fictitious States, Effective Control, And The Use Of Force, Brian C. Finucane

Brian C Finucane

This Article examines state practice relating to violent non-state actors operating from “fictitious” states. Fictitious states are entities that possess international legal personality but not effective control over their territories and populations. As the Article explains, many of the world’s states are legal fictions. Although the problem is most vividly illustrated by the United States’ recent military strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the problem is far broader. This Article shows that the security threat posed by non-state actors operating from ungoverned territory is not new. Lapses in state control have been common throughout history and violent non-state actors have …

Making Murder Legal: How Laws Expanding Self-Defense Allow Criminals To "Get Away With Murder", Elizabeth B. Megale

Elizabeth B. Megale

No abstract provided.

The Gaelic Goetz: A Case Of Self-Defense In Ireland, Stacy Caplow

Stacy Caplow

For two years, the name Padraig Nally was a household word in Ireland. Nally killed an intruder on his farm in a rural community by shooting him in the back as he was running away, already injured from a brutal beating. The intruder was a Traveller, a minority group in Ireland that is mistrusted and ostracized. The killing was so far from the paradigmatic self-defense claim that the trial judge refused to instruct the jury on a full justification defense. He was convicted of manslaughter under a doctrine in Ireland called “excessive force.” After the appeals court reversed because this …

Pretend “Gun-Free” School Zones: A Deadly Legal Fiction, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

Most states issue permits to carry a concealed handgun for lawful protection to an applicant who is over 21 years of age, and who passes a fingerprint-based background check and a safety class. These permits allow the person to carry a concealed defensive handgun almost everywhere in the state. Should professors, school teachers, or adult college and graduate students who have such permits be allowed to carry firearms on campus? In the last two years, many state legislatures have debated the topic. School boards, regents, and administrators are likewise faced with decisions about whether to change campus firearms policies. The …

From Nuclear War To Net War: Analogizing Cyber Attacks In International Law, Scott James Shackelford

Scott Shackelford

On April 27, 2007, Estonia was attacked by a computer network causing widespread damage. It is currently unclear what legal rights a state has as a victim of a cyber attack. Even if Estonia could conclusively prove that it was Russia, for example, behind the March 2007 attack, could it respond with force or its own cyber attack? There is a paucity of literature dealing with these questions, as well as the ethical, humanitarian, and human rights implications of information warfare (“IW”) on national and international security. Treatments of IW outside the orthodox international humanitarian law (“IHL”) framework are nearly …

Colombia’S Incursion Into Ecuadorian Territory: Justified Hot Pursuit Or Pugnacious Error?, Luz Estella Nagle

Luz Estella Nagle

On March 1, 2008, Colombian military forces launched a cross-border airstrike and ground operation into Ecuador to attack a jungle encampment occupied by high ranking members of the Colombian guerrilla army known as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). The specific target of the air attack was Luis Edgar Devia Silva, aka Raul Reyes, the FARC’s number two in command and one of Latin America’s longest enduring guerrilla leaders. Reyes and several cohorts were killed. The Colombian forces retrieved Reyes’ body and forensic evidence, including his laptop computer, and retreated back across the frontier, leaving the Ecuadorian military to …

Two Crises Of Confidence: Securing Non-Proliferation And The Rule Of Law Through Security Council Resolutions, Vik Kanwar

Vik Kanwar

This timely article describes the powers of the United Nations Security Council as they have developed in the field of non-proliferation, and demonstrated in recent resolutions, and goes on to propose a normative framework based on the model of reciprocal “confidence-building” measures to ensure the legality and legitimacy of these resolutions.

Recent proliferation crises (concerning Iran, North Korea, and non-state proliferation networks) have led the Council draw upon various sources-- express and implied powers under the UN Charter, powers granted by specific treaties, and an unusual degree of international consensus-- to expand its powers. This paper attempts to transcend false …

The Natural Right Of Self-Defense: Heller's Lesson For The World, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller constitutionalized the right of self-defense, and described self-defense as a natural, inherent right. Analysis of natural law in Heller shows why Justice Stevens' dissent is clearly incorrect, and illuminates a crucial weakness in Justice Breyer's dissent. The constitutional recognition of the natural law right of self-defense has important implications for American law, and for foreign and international law.

Why Judy Norman Acted In Reasonable Self-Defense: An Abused Woman And A Sleeping Man, Marina Angel

Marina Angel

The reasonable man has been replaced by the reasonable person, but that person still functions within legal doctrines conceived by men and interpreted to fit the facts of men's lives. To understand why it is sometimes reasonable for an abused woman to kill her abuser while he is asleep or otherwise incapacitated, basic criminal law doctrines do not have to be changed. They do, however, have to be applied to the facts of abused women's lives.

The issue of exit – why didn’t she leave – must be explained. Concepts of time – immediate, imminent, and cyclical – must be …

Self-Defense In Asian Religions, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

This Article investigates the attitudes of six Far Eastern religions - Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism - towards the legitimacy of the use of force in individual and collective contexts. Self-defense is strongly legitimated in the theory and practice of the major Far Eastern religions. The finding is consistent with natural law theory that some aspects of the human personality, including the self-defense instinct, are inherent in human nature, rather than being entirely determined by culture.

Transnational Terrorist Organizations And The Use Of Force, Daphne Richemond-Barak

Daphne Richemond-Barak

No abstract provided.

The Catholic Second Amendment, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

At the beginning of the second millennium, there was no separation of church and state, and kings ruled the church. Tyrannicide was considered sinful. By the end of the thirteenth century, however, everything had changed. The Little Renaissance that began in the eleventh century led to a revolution in political and moral philosophy, so that using force to overthrow a tyrannical government became a positive moral duty. The intellectual revolution was an essential step in the evolution of Western political philosophy that eventually led to the American Revolution.

Self-Defense: The Equalizer, David B. Kopel, Linda Gorman

David B Kopel

Experiments in tightening gun-control laws have eroded the right of self defense and failed to stop serious crime. Studies Japan, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.