Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
-
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Other Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tech Giant Exclusion, John B. Kirkwood
Tech Giant Exclusion, John B. Kirkwood
Faculty Articles
There is no topic in regulatory policy that is more pressing and more controversial than what to do about the tech giants – Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple. Critics claim that that these powerful platforms crush competitors, distort the political process, and elude antitrust law because it cares only about consumer prices. The only solution, they argue, is to break them up.
This diagnosis is mistaken. The tech giants have indeed engaged in anticompetitive conduct. They have excluded rivals selling products on their platforms by demoting them in search results, copying their products, or refusing to deal with them. While …
Less Restrictive Alternatives And The Ancillary Restraints Doctrine, Thomas B. Nachbar
Less Restrictive Alternatives And The Ancillary Restraints Doctrine, Thomas B. Nachbar
Seattle University Law Review
In Ohio v. American Express, both the majority and dissent introduced into Supreme Court antitrust jurisprudence a new test for evaluating restraints under the rule of reason: a less restrictive alternatives test. Occasionally appearing in circuit court cases, less restrictive alternatives tests have not been part of Supreme Court’s approach to the rule of reason, which generally evaluates restraints of trade by balancing their anticompetitive and procompetitive effects.
American Express was the first Supreme Court case to mention a less restrictive alternatives test, potentially representing a major shift in antitrust law, but it was not the last. In 2021’s …