Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Fordham Law School

1979

Due process

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Speedy Trial Act: An Empirical Study, Linda M. Ariola, Deborah A. Demasi, Edward D. Loughman Iii, Timothy G. Reynolds Jan 1979

The Speedy Trial Act: An Empirical Study, Linda M. Ariola, Deborah A. Demasi, Edward D. Loughman Iii, Timothy G. Reynolds

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Right To Counsel: Attachment Before Criminal Judicial Proceedings?, Karen Akst Schecter Jan 1979

The Right To Counsel: Attachment Before Criminal Judicial Proceedings?, Karen Akst Schecter

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Driver V. Helms And The Long-Arm, Strong-Arm Effects Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(E), Frederick H. Mcgrath Jan 1979

Driver V. Helms And The Long-Arm, Strong-Arm Effects Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(E), Frederick H. Mcgrath

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law- Due Process-Denial Of Inspection Of Personal Institutional File Does Not Violate A Parole Applicant's Right Of Due Process In The Second Circuit, Rabun Huff Bistline Jan 1979

Constitutional Law- Due Process-Denial Of Inspection Of Personal Institutional File Does Not Violate A Parole Applicant's Right Of Due Process In The Second Circuit, Rabun Huff Bistline

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Case note regarding the due process rights for parole applicants. In Williams v. Ward, the second circuit reversed the lower court and acknowledged that at the very least, some due process rights are guaranteed but that the disclosure of the parole file is not constitutionally guaranteed.


Administrative Agencies And The Rites Of Due Process: Alternatives To Excessive Litigation, Daniel Lee Feldman Jan 1979

Administrative Agencies And The Rites Of Due Process: Alternatives To Excessive Litigation, Daniel Lee Feldman

Fordham Urban Law Journal

With the growth of courtroom litigation, it has become necessary for congress to look to administrative agencies to act in an adjudicative nature. In expanding the role of administrative agencies for efficiency and economic concerns, it is particularly important to still consider the due process rights of citizens. This article addresses the need to balance the procedural due process rights of individuals with the use of administrative agencies to eliminate or at the very least reduce excessive litigation.


Driver V. Helms And The Long-Arm, Strong-Arm Effects Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(E), Frederick H. Mcgrath Jan 1979

Driver V. Helms And The Long-Arm, Strong-Arm Effects Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(E), Frederick H. Mcgrath

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.