Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (17)
- International Law (17)
- Natural Resources Law (16)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (16)
- State and Local Government Law (16)
-
- Criminal Law (15)
- Courts (7)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (16)
- State law; State administrative decision; (16)
- International Law (4)
- Torture Memos (3)
- Clinical practice guidelines (2)
-
- Cognitive Biases (2)
- Detention (2)
- Elimination of Buddhist leadership as genocide (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Extraordinary Chambers for the Courts of Cambodia (2)
- Genocide--Cambodia (2)
- Genocide-ECCC (2)
- Health information technology (2)
- Identity Salience (2)
- Identity Theory (2)
- Independence (2)
- Judgment (2)
- Lawyers and Clients (2)
- Partisan Kinship (2)
- Roberts Court (2)
- Situational Effect (2)
- Special Tribunal for Lebanon (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- "The Limits of International Law" (1)
- 'Chevron' Doctrine (1)
- 'Chevron' deference (1)
- 127 S. Ct. 2553 (27) (1)
- 129 S. Ct. 1142 (29) (1)
- 129 S.Ct. 2633 (29) (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 57
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0816: Ohio Valley Energy Systems V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0816: Ohio Valley Energy Systems V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2009-46
Appeal No. 0796: Ava Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0796: Ava Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-04
Appeal No. 0812: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And D & L Energy, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0812: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And D & L Energy, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Decision Granting Permit (D&L Energy, Inc.)
Appeal No. 0800: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0800: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-55
Appeal No. 0811: Lawrence & Shalynew Fox V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0811: Lawrence & Shalynew Fox V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-91 (Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P.)
Appeal No. 0810: Maverick Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0810: Maverick Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-88
Appeal No. 0798: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0798: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2008-42 and 2008-43
Appeal No. 0801: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0801: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0802: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0802: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0803: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0803: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0799: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0799: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2008-42 and 2008-43
Appeal No. 0808: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0808: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0805: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0805: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0807: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0807: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0809: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0809: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0806: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0806: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
What Are The Requirements For Appointment Of An Expert Under International Criminal Law And What Is The Law Regarding The Examination Of An In-House Expert?, Alex Buskirk
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Can The Systematic Elimination Of Buddhist Leadership Along With A Ban On That Religion And Destruction Of Pagodas Be Used To Charge Genocide Against Khmer Rouge Leaders?, Stephen Ellsesser
Can The Systematic Elimination Of Buddhist Leadership Along With A Ban On That Religion And Destruction Of Pagodas Be Used To Charge Genocide Against Khmer Rouge Leaders?, Stephen Ellsesser
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
What Are The Requirements Of Pleading Jce In An Indictment? What Are The Requirements Of Pleading Co-Perpetration In And Indictment Under The Icc Statute?, Gregory Scott Miao
What Are The Requirements Of Pleading Jce In An Indictment? What Are The Requirements Of Pleading Co-Perpetration In And Indictment Under The Icc Statute?, Gregory Scott Miao
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Can The Systematic Elimination Of Cambodian Citizens Identified As Vietnamese Sympathizers Be Grounds For Charging The Khmer Rouge With Genocide Of The Vietnamese National Group?, Adrienne Cavender
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Grounds For Challenging/Defending Tribunal’S Establishment And Jurisdiction What Are The Possible Legal Challenges Relating To The Establishment And Jurisdiction Of The Tribunal? How Can These Arguments Best Be Refuted?, Jacqueline C. Greene
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Under U.S. And Other Common Law Traditions, What Conditions Have To Be Met For That To Take Place? How Can Assets Be Released And Generally For What Purposes? How And To What Extent And Under What Conditions Can Assets Be Unfrozen?, Saini Sudnagunta
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
What Does International Human Rights/ International Criminal Tribunal Jurisprudence Say About Trials In Absentia?, Jason A. Greenglass
What Does International Human Rights/ International Criminal Tribunal Jurisprudence Say About Trials In Absentia?, Jason A. Greenglass
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Issue As Presented To Me Is “Enforced Disappearance As A Crime Against Humanity (1975): Was Enforced Disappearance A Crime Against Humanity As Part Of Customary International Law In 1975?, Elisabeth Herron
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Corrupt Conditions Surrounding The Eccc And Their Effect On Judicial Decision-Making And The Appearance Of Fairness, Michael A. Kertesz
Corrupt Conditions Surrounding The Eccc And Their Effect On Judicial Decision-Making And The Appearance Of Fairness, Michael A. Kertesz
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Would An Accused Or A Witness Who Is A State Official Be Able To Claim Immunity From Before The Stl? If So, What Type Of Immunity And What Would The Consequences Of Such A Successful Claim Be?, Heather Ludwig
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of “Public Interest” As A Justification For Non-Disclosure Of Evidence By The Prosecution In International Tribunals And Domestic Courts, Geoff B. Mccarrell
The Scope Of “Public Interest” As A Justification For Non-Disclosure Of Evidence By The Prosecution In International Tribunals And Domestic Courts, Geoff B. Mccarrell
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
International Law And The Torture Memos, Michael P. Scharf
International Law And The Torture Memos, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article explores the influence of international law in the evolution of the Bush Administration's policies toward detainees in the global war on terror. The detainee case study provides a modern lens for evaluating Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner's hypothesis set forth in THE LIMITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW that international law exerts no “compliance pull” on American policymakers in times of crisis.
Scientific Evidence And Prosecutorial Misconduct In The Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence And Prosecutorial Misconduct In The Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
The need for pretrial discovery in criminal cases is critical. A defendant's right to confrontation, effective assistance of counsel, and due process often turns on pretrial disclosure. This essay discusses a case that demonstrates this point.
Business, The Environment, And The Roberts Court: A Preliminary Assessment, Jonathan H. Adler
Business, The Environment, And The Roberts Court: A Preliminary Assessment, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
The Roberts Court has developed a reputation for being a "pro-business" court. This article, prepared for the 29 Santa Clara Law Review symposium on "Big Business and the Roberts Court," seeks to offer a preliminary assessment of this claim with reference to the Roberts Court's decisions in environmental cases. Reviewing the environmental law decisions of the Roberts Court to date reveals no evidence of a "pro-business" bias. This does not disprove the claim that the Roberts Court is pro-business, but it may suggest the need to refine conventional descriptions of the Roberts Court. The lack of a pro-business orientation in …