Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- DMCA (2)
- FTC (2)
- ABA Model Rules (1)
- ACLU v. Alvarez (1)
- Act (1)
-
- An Uneasy Balance: Personal Information and Crowdfunding under the JOBS Act (1)
- And Information Governance into Due Diligence Practices (1)
- And Other Tips for Achieving Technical Competence in Your Law Practice (1)
- BSA (1)
- BYOD (1)
- BYOS (1)
- Bank Secrecy Act (1)
- Beyond Technophobia: Lawyers’ Ethical and Legal Obligations to Monitor Evolving Technology and Security Risks (1)
- Blown to Bits: Your Life Liberty and Happiness After the Digital Explosion (1)
- Bring Your Own Software (1)
- Bring your own device (1)
- Brown v. Tellermate Holdings (1)
- CEA (1)
- CROWDFUND (1)
- Capital Raising Online While Deterring Fraud and Unethical Non-Disclosure Act (1)
- Commercial Drones and Privacy: Can We Trust States with ‘Drone Federalism’? (1)
- Conducting U.S. Discovery in Asia: An Overview of E-Discovery and Asian Privacy Laws (1)
- Consumer Electronics Association (1)
- Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright Infringement (1)
- Crowdfunding (1)
- DMCA Safe Harbors (1)
- Digital (1)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cover Letter, Catherine Meade Gray
Cover Letter, Catherine Meade Gray
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its third issue of the Twenty-First Volume, our Annual Survey. This issue is published in conjunction with JOLT’s Symposium, “Who’s Looking At Your Mobile Device? Data Security, Personal Privacy, and Information Governance in the Wireless World.” As one of the leading publications in the legal technology field, JOLT has the privilege of publishing articles that address topics at the forefront of the law. From the Journal’s inception in 1995, JOLT has strived to be a step ahead of these laws in an effort to help shape the …
An Uneasy Balance: Personal Information And Crowdfunding Under The Jobs Act, Brice Kindred
An Uneasy Balance: Personal Information And Crowdfunding Under The Jobs Act, Brice Kindred
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
“Crowdfunding” is the raising of small amounts of money from many different sources for a particular purpose. Today, this usually takes place online.2 Crowdfunding has become a popular means of raising funds for a wide variety of projects, causes, and business ventures. Websites like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and Crowdfunder allow people to create a profile for their project and solicit contributions from the general public in support.
The New Esi Sanctions Framework Under The Proposed Rule 37(E) Amendments, Philip J. Favro
The New Esi Sanctions Framework Under The Proposed Rule 37(E) Amendments, Philip J. Favro
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The debate over the necessity, substance, and form of the proposed e-Discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rules) has been ongoing for over four years. Since the Duke Conference convened in May 2010, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Civil Rules (Committee) has been working to address many of the perceived shortcomings in the current Rules regime.
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the Twenty-First Volume. As one of the leading publications in the legal technology field, JOLT has the privilege of publishing articles that address topics at the forefront of the law. From the Journal’s inception in 1995, JOLT has strived to be a step ahead of these laws in an effort to help shape the emerging legal landscape. Additionally, JOLT recognizes the practical benefit that many of its articles have on legal professionals and we publish articles with this goal in mind. The following articles …
Beyond Technophobia: Lawyers’ Ethical And Legal Obligations To Monitor Evolving Technology And Security Risks, Timothy J. Toohey
Beyond Technophobia: Lawyers’ Ethical And Legal Obligations To Monitor Evolving Technology And Security Risks, Timothy J. Toohey
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Lawyers and technology have an uneasy relationship. Although some lawyers are early adapters, others take pride in ignoring technology because they believe it is alien to the practice of law. As Jody R. Westby observed, lawyers confronted with technology and security issues tend to have their “eyes glaze over” and “want to call in their ‘IT guy’ and go back to work.” But this technophobic attitude may no longer just be harmless conservatism. In the world of growing security risks, ignorance of technology may lead to violations of lawyers’ fundamental ethical duties of competence and confidentiality.
The Internet Of Things And Wearable Technology: Addressing Privacy And Security Concerns Without Derailing Innovation, Adam D. Thierer
The Internet Of Things And Wearable Technology: Addressing Privacy And Security Concerns Without Derailing Innovation, Adam D. Thierer
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The next great wave of Internet-enabled innovation has arrived, and it is poised to revolutionize the way humans interact with the world around them. This paper highlights some of the opportunities presented by the rise of the so-called Internet of Things (IoT) in general and wearable technology in particular and encourages policymakers to allow these technologies to develop in a relatively unabated fashion.
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its fourth and final issue of the Twenty-First Volume. At its inception in 1995 JOLT became the first law review to be published exclusively online. From this moment on, the Journal has continued to set trends in the legal scholarship world. As one of the leading publications in the legal technology field, JOLT has the privilege of publishing articles that address topics at the forefront of the law. The articles in this fourth issue are no exception. Each of the following articles present exciting discussions on cutting-edge areas of …
Danger In The Dmca Safe Harbors: The Need To Narrow What Constitutes Red Flag Knowledge, Hank Fisher
Danger In The Dmca Safe Harbors: The Need To Narrow What Constitutes Red Flag Knowledge, Hank Fisher
Law Student Publications
This comment considers recent cases interpreting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and urges Congress to expand the protection of service providers through the DMCA safe harbors. The comment proceeds in six parts. Part I explains contributory and vicarious liability, the applicable sections of the DMCA to this comment, and the fair use doctrine. Part II provides a brief overview of video-sharing websites. It further observes the impact that video-sharing websites have had on digital media, focusing on the impact on the music industry. Part III looks at the recent cases interpreting the DMCA's red flag exception to safe harbor …
Danger In The Dmca Safe Harbors: The Need To Narrow What Constitutes Red Flag Knowledge, Hank Fisher
Danger In The Dmca Safe Harbors: The Need To Narrow What Constitutes Red Flag Knowledge, Hank Fisher
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Merger And Acquisition Due Diligence: A Proposed Framework To Incorporate Data Privacy, Information Security, E-Discovery, And Information Governance Into Due Diligence Practices, James A. Sherer, Taylor M. Hoffman, Eugenio E. Ortiz
Merger And Acquisition Due Diligence: A Proposed Framework To Incorporate Data Privacy, Information Security, E-Discovery, And Information Governance Into Due Diligence Practices, James A. Sherer, Taylor M. Hoffman, Eugenio E. Ortiz
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Merger and Acquisition or “M&A” deals are both figuratively and literally big business, where the stakes for the organization are often the highest. While casual observers might expect that the importance attached to these deals makes each new deal the vanguard for incorporating metrics and practices regarding every efficiency and contingency, existing research demonstrates that this is decidedly not the case.