Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

"Offer To Sell" As A Policy Tool, Lucas S. Osborn Feb 2012

"Offer To Sell" As A Policy Tool, Lucas S. Osborn

Lucas S. Osborn

Gone are the days when the term “offer” is confined to first-year contracts courses and the intricacies of contract formation. The offer concept has quietly migrated throughout the law. It now regulates behavior in areas as diverse as criminal law, environmental law, securities law, and intellectual property law. Despite its wide diffusion, the offer concept remains largely unstudied as a legal concept outside of its contract-law environment. This Article begins to fill that gap. The Article begins by deconstructing the meaning of a traditional contract-law “offer” to determine its policy role in contract law, and then compares that role with …


Best Practices For Drafting University Technology Assignment Agreements After Filmtec, Stanford V. Roche, And Patent Reform, Parker Miles Tresemer Jan 2012

Best Practices For Drafting University Technology Assignment Agreements After Filmtec, Stanford V. Roche, And Patent Reform, Parker Miles Tresemer

Parker Tresemer

Since the end of World War II, federally funded universities and private companies have been an integral part of continued American innovation and technological production. However, like most rational economic actors, universities and private companies are only willing to invest in federally funded technologies if they are guaranteed some sort of exclusive return on their investment. By granting federal contractors exclusive patent rights to their employee’s federally funded inventions, the Bayh-Dole Act provided the necessary incentives for private sector investment in federally funded technologies. However, case law subsequent to Bayh-Dole’s enactment has significantly undermined the system of incentives Congress intended …


The Gao 500: Effects Of Non-Practicing Entities On Patent Litigation, Robin C. Feldman, Sara Jeruss, Joshua Walker Dec 2011

The Gao 500: Effects Of Non-Practicing Entities On Patent Litigation, Robin C. Feldman, Sara Jeruss, Joshua Walker

Robin C Feldman

Any discussion of flaws in the United States patent system inevitably turns to the system’s modern villain: non-practicing entities, known more colorfully as patent trolls. For many years, however, discussions about non practicing entities have been long on speculation and short on data.

In 2011 Congress directed the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office to study the effects of non-practicing entities on patent litigation. Our study was performed at the request of the GAO, examining patent lawsuits filed over the past five years. The data confirm in a dramatic fashion what many scholars and commentators have suspected: patent monetization entities play a …


Addressing Access To Medicine: The Influence Of Competing Patent Perspectives, Cynthia M. Ho Apr 2011

Addressing Access To Medicine: The Influence Of Competing Patent Perspectives, Cynthia M. Ho

Cynthia M Ho

Promoting access to affordable medicine for poor countries is considered important by a wide range of actors, including not only rich and poor countries, but also public health advocates, patent owners, and scholars. However, promoting access has been elusive. Public health advocates argue that access to medicine is increasingly difficult due to changes in domestic and international laws that limit access to unpatented and low-cost generic drugs by expanding the scope of patent rights. Patent owners and some countries deny these claims while simultaneously advocating for more expansive patent rights as necessary to promote innovation and development. This article addresses …


Regulatory Approval Of Follow-On Biologics: Takings Implications Of Twelve Years Of Market Exclusivity And Future Conflict In Determinations Of Bioequivalence, Aileen Mcgill Dec 2009

Regulatory Approval Of Follow-On Biologics: Takings Implications Of Twelve Years Of Market Exclusivity And Future Conflict In Determinations Of Bioequivalence, Aileen Mcgill

Aileen M McGill

Congressional interest in the availability of low-cost pharmaceuticals has focused on the increasingly important class of drugs known as “biologics.” Biologics are protein-based pharmaceuticals derived from living matter or manufactured in living cells, which are more complex than the chemically synthesized molecules found in most pharmaceutical products. While there are many scientific differences between small-molecule pharmaceuticals and biologics, one of the most significant is the inability to reproduce them in generic form, creating a legislative division between generic entry for standard pharmaceuticals governed by the Hatch-Waxman Act and a similar approval process for “follow-on biologics” (FOBs). With the passage of …


On Breaking Patents: Separating Strands Of Fact From Fiction Under Trips, Cynthia M. Ho Sep 2008

On Breaking Patents: Separating Strands Of Fact From Fiction Under Trips, Cynthia M. Ho

Cynthia M Ho

This article provides the first comprehensive analysis of when compulsory licensing of patents is permissible as a matter of international law under the Agreement of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). Thailand’s recent compulsory licenses of patents on a variety of medications provide a convenient vehicle to analyze the limits of compulsory licensing under TRIPS. Thailand’s actions are unique; most countries hesitate to issue compulsory licenses in the wake of legal uncertainties regarding TRIPS requirements as well as political pressure. This article capitalizes on the many issues involved in Thailand’s licenses to provide an authoritative interpretation of the scope of …


A Technological Theory Of The Arms Race, Lee B. Kovarsky Dec 2005

A Technological Theory Of The Arms Race, Lee B. Kovarsky

Lee Kovarsky

Although the 'technological arms race' has recently emerged as a vogue-ish piece of legal terminology, scholarship has quite conspicuously failed to explore the phenomenon systematically. What are 'technological' arms races? Why do they happen? Does the recent spike in scholarly attention actually reflect their novelty? Are they always inefficient? How do they differ from military ones? What role can legal institutions play in slowing them down? In this Article I seek to answer these questions. I argue that copyright enforcement and self-help represent substitutable tactics for regulating access to expressive assets, and that the efficacy of each tactic depends on …