Law Commons^™

Labor Disputes In Professional Sports: How Federal Judges Referee Antitrust Lawsuits-- False Starts And Technical Fouls, Michael Leroy

Michael H LeRoy

Using a database of 83 published court opinions from 1970-2011, I show that players have utilized conflicting federal laws to improve their labor market mobility. They formed unions under the National Labor Relations Act, and bargained collectively with leagues. Often, however, they lacked bargaining power to modify the draft or reserve clause, which bound them to a team. Players sued, therefore, under the Sherman Act to challenge these practices as restraints of trade. Thus, players have used a dual engagement strategy of bargaining with leagues under the NLRA while holding identical negotiations under the threat of Sherman Act treble damages. …

The Fetish For Authentic Race In American Law, Christopher A. Bracey

Christopher A Bracey

This article offers an interdisciplinary and transhistorical account of race authentication as it has evolved over the past two centuries within American law and culture. As 21st century Americans, we find ourselves in the midst of an authenticity revival – a reaction to the increasingly vapid and digitized world in which we live. We generally crave authentic items and experiences, and this impulse has gained increased traction in the racial context. Most commentators agree that American society has become increasingly multiracial, and that race now takes on diminished significance as a determining factor of one’s life chances. Yet there are …

The Distorted Reality Of Civil Recourse Theory, Alan Calnan

Alan Calnan

In their recent article Torts as Wrongs, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer their most complete and accessible explanation of the civil recourse theory (CRT) of tort law. A purely descriptive account, CRT holds that tort law is exclusively a scheme of private rights for the redress of legal wrongs and is not a pragmatic mechanism for imposing strict liability or implementing public policy. The present paper challenges this view by revealing critical errors in its perspective, methodology, and analysis. It shows that Goldberg and Zipursky do not objectively observe tort law and uncritically report what they …

Mr. Justice Horace Gray: Judicial Philosophy And Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Nick John Peter Meros

Nick John Peter Meros

The vast majority of contemporary biographic paradigms of Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray classify him as a ``nationalist,'' or ardent supporter of the federal government's interest and sovereignty over state and local governments. Legal historians and scholars cite decisions and opinions in which he promoted ``substantial and effective national government power'' over interstate commerce and upheld state government’s police powers as evidence for his ``nationalism.''

My research, however, reveals that Justice Gray repeatedly ruled against the federal government and for state and local interests. Moreover, Gray's opinions in favor of the federal government highlighted not its superiority over state and …

., V V

Vinicius Pintas Marinho

.

From The Thief In The Night To The Guest Who Stayed Too Long: The Evolution Of Burglary In The Shadow Of The Common Law, Helen A. Anderson

Helen A. Anderson

Burglary has been evolving from the common law crime almost as soon as Lord Coke defined it in 1641 as breaking and entering a dwelling of another in the night with the intent to commit a crime therein. But sometime between the Model Penal Code in 1962 and today burglary lost its core actus reus, “entry.” In the majority of jurisdictions, burglary can now be accomplished by simply remaining in a building or vehicle with the intent to commit a crime. Not only does such an offense cover a wide range of situations, but it allows burglary to be attached …

From The Thief In The Night To The Guest Who Stayed Too Long: The Evolution Of Burglary In The Shadow Of The Common Law, Helen A. Anderson

Helen A. Anderson

Burglary has been evolving from the common law crime almost as soon as Lord Coke defined it in 1641 as breaking and entering a dwelling of another in the night with the intent to commit a crime therein. It expanded early on to include breaking and entering buildings, not just dwellings, and the breaking requirement became little more than symbolic in many jurisdictions. But sometime between the Model Penal Code in 1962 and today burglary lost its core actus reus, “entry.” In the majority of jurisdictions, burglary can now be accomplished by simply remaining in a building or vehicle with …

Dicta On Adrenalin(E): Myriad Problems With Learned Hand's Product-Of-Nature Pronouncements In Parke-Davis V. Mulford, Jon M. Harkness

Jon M. Harkness

Gene patents of the type at issue in the Myriad case that is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future are based on an exception to the general principle that patents should not be allowed on products of nature. This exception holds that isolated or purified products of nature can be patented if they have commercial utility. It is widely recognized that this exception can be traced to language from an opinion issued by Judge Learned Hand in a 1911 case, Parke-Davis v. Mulford, which involved a patent dispute over a therapeutically useful version of the …

Formalism, Facts And The Brandeis Brief: The Making Of A Myth, Noga Morag-Levine

Noga Morag-Levine

The Brandeis Brief has long been central to historical accounts of the struggle and ultimate triumph of progressive jurisprudence over legal formalism. Yet this familiar storyline is difficult to reconcile with the historical record on two counts. The first is its incompatibility with the presence of extra-legal evidence in cases and briefs well predating that of Brandeis. The second is the fact that, contrary to the prevailing account, conservatives were not the vanguard of opposition to such extra-legal evidence. In practice, it was progressive defenders of social legislation who long sought to exclude proof regarding the alleged health and other …

The Myth Of Church-State Separation, David E. Steinberg

David E. Steinberg

The Myth Of Church-State Separation

by David E. Steinberg

Abstract

This article asserts that the church-state separation interpretation of Establishment Clause history is simply wrong. When they enacted the First Amendment, the framers were focused on the first five words of the amendment, which read: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . .” The Establishment Clause guaranteed that the federal government would not interfere in state regulation of religion – whatever form that state regulation took. Rather than enacting the Establishment Clause to mandate a separation of church …

Missouri's Ring Tone: Jury Sentencing Rights In Death Penalty Cases, Jacqueline M. Whipple

Jacqueline M. Whipple

This Law Summary concerns recent developments in criminal law and the death penalty. It includes the national and state-specific legal background behind criminal defendants' rights regarding jury sentencing, and the latest interpretation and application of the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Ring v. Arizona by the Missouri Supreme Court.

Psychopathy As Sword Or Shield? A Legislative Proposal For The Greater Good, Vanessa Catherine Whirl

Vanessa Catherine Whirl

While mental health law has developed over the recent years as the fields of psychology and law combine their research, a gap is still left for one of the world’s most threatening mental health patients, psychopaths. Current legal definitions of “mental illness” exclude this diagnosis from legislation aimed at special attention and treatment of mental health patients. This issue is addressed in this article by legislative history, discussion of needed for changes in the laws regarding psychopathy, and analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Finally, a proposal for legislation is made altering the prongs of current civil commitment statutes in …

Legal Ethics And Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, And Advice, Michael Hatfield

Michael Hatfield

Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice

ABSTRACT

At a time in which tax reform, tax shelters, and tax protestors are headline news, and the tax bar is debating the appropriate ethical standards for tax advice, Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice provides a timely historical review of legal ethics and federal taxes. Focusing on the first two decades of the modern income tax (1945-1965), the Article reviews the ethics literature of the tax bar, which was mostly written by very prominent tax lawyers (a founder of Paul, Weiss; partners at Sullivan & …

Legal Ethics And Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, And Advice, Michael Hatfield

Michael Hatfield

Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice

ABSTRACT

At a time in which tax reform, tax shelters, and tax protestors are headline news, and the tax bar is debating the appropriate ethical standards for tax advice, Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice provides a timely historical review of legal ethics and federal taxes. Focusing on the first two decades of the modern income tax (1945-1965), the Article reviews the ethics literature of the tax bar, which was mostly written by very prominent tax lawyers (a founder of Paul, Weiss; partners at Sullivan & …

Dr. King’S Speech: Surveying The Landscape Of Law And Justice In The Speeches, Sermons, And Writings Of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Carlton Waterhouse

Carlton Waterhouse

ABSTRACT The belief that an essential relationship exists between law and justice has been recognized since the time of the ancient Greeks. In fact, the concept extends well beyond Western philosophy and jurisprudence. Distinct from other aspects of justice, the relationship between law and justice considers the nature of law and its dictates as well as the responsibility of citizens to obey it. Although Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lacked the developed legal analysis of jurisprudence scholars, he made a meaningful contribution to the intellectual discourse of his time by forcing the discussion on the broader society and centering it …

Restoring The Presumption Of Innocence, Shima Baradaran

Shima Baradaran

The most commonly repeated adage in U.S. criminal justice is the presumption of innocence: defendants are deemed innocent until proven guilty. Historically, this presumption carried important meaning both before and during trial. However, in light of state and federal changes in pretrial practice, as well as Supreme Court precedent restricting the presumption’s application to trial, the presumption of innocence no longer protects defendants before trial. These limitations on the presumption are fundamentally inconsistent with its constitutional roots. The results of the presumption’s diminution are also troubling as the number of defendants held pretrial has steadily increased such that the majority …

Marshall And O'Connor: Categorical First Justices And Their Impact On Federal Indian Law, Richard L. Barnes

richard l barnes

Thurgood Marshall was the first African-American appointed to the United States Supreme Court. Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman appointed. As firsts in their category their historical role is assured, but their legacy is broader. This Article examines one piece of their legacies: Is it plausible to find some of their character as ‘Firsts’ in their opinions for the Court in Indian cases? Specifically can we find a legacy of categorical pioneering in the Justices’ treatment of American Indians as another category of people underrepresented on the Court?

My working hypothesis was that the sympathy some might expect from …

The Fortas Film Festival, Brian L. Frye

Brian L Frye

The story of Jack Smith’s film Flaming Creatures and the “Fortas Film Festival” illustrates the dialectic of obscenity. The obscenity doctrine expresses the conventional wisdom that the First Amendment actually protects art, and protects pornography only by extension. But Flaming Creatures and the Fortas Film Festival suggest that obscenity is dialectical. The obscenity doctrine provides the thesis: art protects pornography, by justifying the protection of sexual expression. Flaming Creatures and the Fortas Film Festival provide the antithesis: pornography protects art, by normalizing sexual expression. The history of obscenity law provides the synthesis: art and pornography protect each other. In other …

Helping Ideas Have Consequences: Political And Intellectual Investment In The Unitary Executive Theory, 1981-2000, Amanda L. Hollis-Brusky

Amanda Hollis-Brusky

This article explains the remarkable frequency with which the Unitary Executive Theory (UET) was used in the George W. Bush Justice Department (2001-2008) as legal justification for Executive branch action. It shows how this seemingly sudden turn in Executive branch interpretation was actually the result of a series of long-term political investments by key conservative and libertarian actors who worked to develop the intellectual underpinnings of the UET first within the Reagan and George H. W. Bush Justice Departments and then within the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy. Specifically, it draws on interview data and other ethnographic evidence …

Marshall And O'Connor: Categorical First Justices And Their Impact On Federal Indian Law, Richard L. Barnes

richard l barnes

Thurgood Marshall was the first African-American appointed to the United States Supreme Court. Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman appointed. As firsts in their category their historical role is assured, but their legacy is broader. This Article examines one piece of their legacies: Is it plausible to find some of their character as ‘Firsts’ in their opinions for the Court in Indian cases? Specifically can we find a legacy of categorical pioneering in the Justices’ treatment of American Indians as another category of people underrepresented on the Court?

My working hypothesis was that the sympathy some might expect from …

Sacrifice And Sacred Honor: Why The Constitution Is A Suicide Pact, Peter B. Bayer

Peter B Bayer

Most legal scholars and elected officials embrace the popular cliché that “the Constitution is not a suicide pact.” Typically, those commentators extol the “Constitution of necessity,” the supposition that Government, essentially the Executive, may take any action -- may abridge or deny any fundamental right -- to alleviate a serious national security threat. The Constitution of necessity is wrong. This article explains that strict devotion to the “fundamental fairness” principles of the Constitution’s Due Process Clauses is America’s utmost legal and moral duty, surpassing all other considerations, even safety, security and survival. Analysis begins with the most basic premises: the …

Unanimity: History, Empirics, & Mcdonald, Zachary C. Smallwood

Zachary C. Smallwood

In light of the recent McDonald decision, which abandoned the concept of State experimentation and mandates States to mirror Constitutional standards of federal interpretations, unanimity once again becomes a relevant question to American jurisprudence. Given data, history, and policy considerations, McDonald dictates that Oregon’s failure to echo the federal Sixth Amendment standards is inconsistent. Accordingly, to allow Oregon to apply a watered-down Sixth Amendment standard as compared to its federal counterpart is to apply the two-track approach that defies the Court’s recent ruling in McDonald. Thus, unanimity ought to be preserved as a right essential to the Sixth Amendment and …

The Vanishing Indian Returns, Kathryn Fort

Kathryn Fort

As the nation faces cultural divides over the meaning of the “Founding,” the Constitution, and who owns these meanings, the Court’s embrace of originalism is one strand that feeds the divide. The Court’s valuing of the original interpretation of the Constitution has reinforced the Founder fetishism also found in popular culture, specifically within the politics of those identified as the Tea Party. As addressed elsewhere, their strict worship of the Founders has historical implications for both women and African Americans, groups both marginalized and viewed as property in the Constitution. No one, however, has written about how the Court's cobbled …

What's Wrong With "Torts As Wrongs" (Or Redirecting Civil Recourse Theory), Alan Calnan

Alan Calnan

In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer their most complete and accessible explanation of the civil recourse theory of tort law. A purely descriptive account, civil recourse theory has both positive and negative components. The positive side holds that tort law is a scheme of private rights for the redress of legal wrongs, while the negative side says the law eschews strict liability and forbids instrumentalism. The present paper challenges both prongs of this theory, identifying three problems which undermine its credibility. First, Goldberg and Zipursky do not objectively observe tort law and uncritically …

When The Wise (Latina) Judge Meets A Living Constitution - Why It Is A Matter Of Perception, Laura A. Hernandez

Laura A Hernandez

At the time of Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings, much was made of a statement she made in a 2001 lecture at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law concerning a judge’s approach to the cases that come before her. “. . . . I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.” The resulting backlash and condemnation caused Justice Sotomayor to apologize for her endorsement of the idea that a wise Latina would, and should, …

The Path, Posner, And Persuasion: Jurisprudential Stances And Style In Judicial Writing And Their Influence On Legal Education, Amy C. Thorn

Amy C Thorn

No abstract provided.