Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Autonomous vehicles (1)
- Blood--Examination (1)
- Driver's licenses--Minnesota (1)
- Drivers' licenses--Suspension (1)
- Drunk driving--Minnesota (1)
-
- Due process of law (1)
- Implied consent (Law) (1)
- Motor vehicles (1)
- Peace officers (1)
- Probable cause (Searches and seizures) (1)
- Railroad law (1)
- Railroads--Safety regulations (1)
- Reasonable suspicion (Law) (1)
- Searches and seizures--United States (1)
- Self-driving cars (1)
- Smart technology (1)
- Transportion laws (1)
- Undocumented immigrants--Minnesota (1)
- United States Federal Railroad Safety Act (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Autonomous Vehicles: Regulatory Challenges And The Response From Germany And Uk, Antonios E. Kouroutakis
Autonomous Vehicles: Regulatory Challenges And The Response From Germany And Uk, Antonios E. Kouroutakis
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cybersecurity In The Marine Transportation Sector: Protecting Intellectual Property To Keep Our Ports, Facilities, And Vessels Safe From Cyber Threats, Rachel Foote
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Whistleblower Protections Of The Federal Rail Safety Act: An Overview, Christopher W. Bowman
Whistleblower Protections Of The Federal Rail Safety Act: An Overview, Christopher W. Bowman
Journal of Law and Practice
No abstract provided.
Driving Privilege Cards For Undocumented Minnesotans: Addressing Constitutional Concerns And Promoting Public Safety, Lindsey R. Wheeler
Driving Privilege Cards For Undocumented Minnesotans: Addressing Constitutional Concerns And Promoting Public Safety, Lindsey R. Wheeler
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revoke First, Ask Questions Later: Challenging Minnesota’S Unconstitutional Pre-Hearing Revocation Scheme, Jeffrey S. Sheridan, Erika Burkhart Booth
Revoke First, Ask Questions Later: Challenging Minnesota’S Unconstitutional Pre-Hearing Revocation Scheme, Jeffrey S. Sheridan, Erika Burkhart Booth
William Mitchell Law Review
This analysis of the constitutionality of Minnesota’s prehearing revocation scheme begins by explaining the mechanics of Minnesota’s implied consent statute. Because the United States Supreme Court has established minimum procedural due process protections that must be afforded drivers, this backdrop is examined. After considering the federal standards for procedural due process, the numerous changes to Minnesota’s implied consent statute will be addressed. Next, the current challenge will be discussed, including the factual basis for the challenge, the arguments for the statute’s unconstitutionality, and the district court’s decision. Finally, this note will conclude that, given the dramatic increase in the private …
State V. Askerooth: Re-Applying The Terry Principle Of Reasonableness To Traffic Stops Under The Minnesota Constitution, Jodie Carlson
State V. Askerooth: Re-Applying The Terry Principle Of Reasonableness To Traffic Stops Under The Minnesota Constitution, Jodie Carlson
William Mitchell Law Review
This note first discusses the Minnesota Supreme Court’s use of the Minnesota Constitution to provide broader protections for its citizens in the area of Fourth Amendment search and seizure law. This note then explains the rationale for the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in Askerooth. Finally, this note discusses the Atwater decision and whether it was necessary for the Minnesota Supreme Court to decide Askerooth under the state constitution.