Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 24 of 24
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …
Oklahoma Landlords Beware: Miller V. David Grace, Inc. Abandons Caveat Emptor In Residential Leases, Jamie M. Powers
Oklahoma Landlords Beware: Miller V. David Grace, Inc. Abandons Caveat Emptor In Residential Leases, Jamie M. Powers
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Slapping Around The First Amendment: An Analysis Of Oklahoma’S Anti-Slapp Statute And Its Implications On The Right To Petition, Laura Long
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tarnished Golden Rule — Why Badillo V. Mid Century Insurance Co. Demands Further Clarification From The Oklahoma Supreme Court Regarding The Tort Of Bad Faith, Andrew Kernan
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In Oklahoma Class Action Law, Jim T. Priest, Michael R. Pacewicz
Recent Developments In Oklahoma Class Action Law, Jim T. Priest, Michael R. Pacewicz
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Review Of Oklahoma's 2003 And 2004 Tort Reform, Beth Reynolds
A Review Of Oklahoma's 2003 And 2004 Tort Reform, Beth Reynolds
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure: Medical Malpractice Gets Eerie: The Erie Implications Of A Heightened Pleading Burden In Oklahoma, Dace A. Caldwell
Civil Procedure: Medical Malpractice Gets Eerie: The Erie Implications Of A Heightened Pleading Burden In Oklahoma, Dace A. Caldwell
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punitive Damages: Cooper Industries V. Leatherman Tool Group: Will A Constitutional Objection To The Excessiveness Of A Punitive Damages Award Save Defendants From Oklahoma's Punitive Damages Statute, Amanda L. Maxfield
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Licensees In Landoccupiers' Liability Law - Should They Be Exterminated Or Resurrected, Osborne M. Reynolds Jr.
Licensees In Landoccupiers' Liability Law - Should They Be Exterminated Or Resurrected, Osborne M. Reynolds Jr.
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts: Nealis V. Baird: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Extends Fetal Rights In Wrongful Death Suits But Leaves Important Questions Unanswered, Cory Hicks
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure: Exclusion Of Injured Or Disfigured Plaintiffs From Trial-- Cary V. Oneok, Inc. --A Solution To The Exclusion Issue Or Bad Precedent?, Kristy Freeman
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Oklahoma Drug Dealer Liability: A Civil Remedy For A "Victimless" Crime, Clinton W. Taylor
The Oklahoma Drug Dealer Liability: A Civil Remedy For A "Victimless" Crime, Clinton W. Taylor
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts: Kraszewski V. Baptist Medical Center Of Oklahoma, Inc.--The Oklahoma Supreme Court Recognizes The Tort Of Intentional Infliction Of Severe Emotional Distress In A New Context, Matthew B. Free
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts: Kirkpatrick V. Chrysler Corp.--Are YouSatisfied--Oklahoma's Rigid Application Of The One Satisfaction Rule Is Not So Rigid Anymore, Christopher T. Moore
Torts: Kirkpatrick V. Chrysler Corp.--Are YouSatisfied--Oklahoma's Rigid Application Of The One Satisfaction Rule Is Not So Rigid Anymore, Christopher T. Moore
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employment Law: Report A Crime, Lose Your Job: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Reins In The Public Policy Exception In Hayes V. Eateries, Inc., M. Derek Zolner
Employment Law: Report A Crime, Lose Your Job: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Reins In The Public Policy Exception In Hayes V. Eateries, Inc., M. Derek Zolner
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Products Liability: Terrorist Bombs And Strict Liability--A Volatile Formula For Fertilizer Makers?, Walter D. Miller
Products Liability: Terrorist Bombs And Strict Liability--A Volatile Formula For Fertilizer Makers?, Walter D. Miller
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts: Moss V. City Of Oklahoma City Marks The Demise Of The General Tort Liability Release, Erika Blomquist
Torts: Moss V. City Of Oklahoma City Marks The Demise Of The General Tort Liability Release, Erika Blomquist
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts: Anderson V. Eichner--Although Faculty Physicians, Resident Physicians, And Interns Face Private Tort Liability For Medical Malpractice, The State Is Immune, Christa L. Britton
Torts: Anderson V. Eichner--Although Faculty Physicians, Resident Physicians, And Interns Face Private Tort Liability For Medical Malpractice, The State Is Immune, Christa L. Britton
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Care: Erisa Preemption And Hmo Liability--A Fresh Look At Erisa Preemption In The Context Of Subscriber Claims Against Hmos, Brooks Richardson
Health Care: Erisa Preemption And Hmo Liability--A Fresh Look At Erisa Preemption In The Context Of Subscriber Claims Against Hmos, Brooks Richardson
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Informed Consent Liability In A "Material Information" Jurisdiction: What Does The Future Portend?, William J. Mcnichols
Informed Consent Liability In A "Material Information" Jurisdiction: What Does The Future Portend?, William J. Mcnichols
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Negligence: Strubhart V. Perry Memorial Hospital: Taming The Monster Of Corporate Negligence Or Creating An Unpredictable Form Of Hospital Liability?, Jeannie Pinkston
Negligence: Strubhart V. Perry Memorial Hospital: Taming The Monster Of Corporate Negligence Or Creating An Unpredictable Form Of Hospital Liability?, Jeannie Pinkston
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Charities - Torts - Liability Of Charitable Corporations For Their Torts, Raymond H. Rapaport
Charities - Torts - Liability Of Charitable Corporations For Their Torts, Raymond H. Rapaport
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was employed by defendant to assist in the work of redecorating defendant's building, and was injured because of defendant's alleged failure to provide a suitable place to work. To plaintiff's plea for damages defendant answered that since it was a charitable corporation it was, therefore, immune from such action. Held, charitable corporations are not immune from liability for torts by reason of any exemption accorded them on the basis of the purposes for which they were incorporated. Gable v. Salvation Army, 186 Okla. 687, 100 P. (2d) 244 (1940).
Torts -Attractive Nuisance
Michigan Law Review
Dynamite caps were left on the banks of a slush pit near defendant's gas well. Cultivated fields immediately around the pit were under lease to a Mr. Bradshaw whose small boy, trespassing upon defendant's pit, found the dynamite caps and showed them to his father who permitted the boy to play with them, thinking that the caps had been exploded. Later the Bradshaw boy gave them to plaintiff, aged five, who drove a nail into a cap which exploded and injured him. Evidence showed that there was a path near the slush pit, and that children frequently crossed the field …
Negligence-"Last Clear Chance" Doctrine
Negligence-"Last Clear Chance" Doctrine
Michigan Law Review
ln an action for damages by a negligent driver oi a motorcycle against a negligent driver of an automobile for injuries sustained in a collision between them, the instructions to the jury were that the plaintiff could recover, "if it be shown that the defendant might, by the exercise of reasonable care and prudence, have avoided the consequences of the plaintiff's negligence." Held, the instructions are erroneous in omitting the essential element of the last clear chance doctrine, that the plaintiff's peril must have been known to the defendant in time to have avoided the accident. Graybill v. Clancy …