Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Torts (10)
- Coastal Zone Management (4)
- Virginia (4)
- Artificial Intelligence (3)
- Contributory Negligence (3)
-
- Negligence (3)
- Product Liability (3)
- Tort Law (3)
- Tort Liability (3)
- Assumption of Risk Doctrine (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Constitutional Torts (2)
- Damages (2)
- Duty of Care (2)
- Juries (2)
- Legal Liability (2)
- Political Power (2)
- Right of Privacy (2)
- Sovereign Immunity (2)
- State Courts (2)
- Warranty (2)
- Algorithms (1)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (403 U.S. 388 (1971)) (1)
- Calder v. Jones 465 U.S. 783 (1984) (1)
- Causation (1)
- Causation (Law) (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Compatibility (1)
- Computers (1)
- Contributory Infringement (Copyright & Trademark) (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 30 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
Trolley Problems, Private Necessity, And The Duty To Rescue, Laura A. Heymann
Trolley Problems, Private Necessity, And The Duty To Rescue, Laura A. Heymann
Faculty Publications
Laidlaw v. Sage is generally, at best, an oddity in Torts casebooks today. A case that captured the imagination of New York newspaper readers at the time, Laidlaw involved an explosion that, William Laidlaw argued, the wealthy Russell Sage survived only because, at the last moment, he pulled Laidlaw in front of him to absorb the brunt of the blast. As taught in Torts classrooms, Laidlaw is either a case about the intent requirement for battery or a case about causation. But the case, assuming the plaintiff’s story was true, also provides an interesting window into what would seem to …
A Scapegoat Theory Of Bivens, Katherine Mims Crocker
A Scapegoat Theory Of Bivens, Katherine Mims Crocker
Faculty Publications
Some scapegoats are innocent. Some warrant blame, but not the amount they are made to bear. Either way, scapegoating can allow in-groups to sidestep social problems by casting blame onto out-groups instead of confronting such problems--and the in-groups' complicity in perpetuating them--directly.
This Essay suggests that it may be productive to view the Bivens regime's rise as countering various exercises in scapegoating and its retrenchment as constituting an exercise in scapegoating. The earlier cases can be seen as responding to social structures that have scapegoated racial, economic, and other groups through overaggressive policing, mass incarceration, and inequitable government conduct more …
Keeping Ai Under Observation: Anticipated Impacts On Physicians' Standard Of Care, Iria Giuffrida, Taylor Treece
Keeping Ai Under Observation: Anticipated Impacts On Physicians' Standard Of Care, Iria Giuffrida, Taylor Treece
Faculty Publications
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools become increasingly present across industries, concerns have started to emerge as to their impact on professional liability. Specifically, for the medical industry--in many ways an inherently "risky" business--hospitals and physicians have begun evaluating the impact of Al tools on their professional malpractice risk. This Essay seeks to address that question, zooming in on how AI may affect physicians' standard of care for medical malpractice claims.
Knowing How To Know: Secondary Liability For Speech In Copyright Law, Laura A. Heymann
Knowing How To Know: Secondary Liability For Speech In Copyright Law, Laura A. Heymann
Faculty Publications
Contributory copyright infringement has long been based on whether the defendant, "with knowledge of the infringing activity," induced, caused, or materially contributed to another's infringing conduct. But few court opinions or scholarly articles have given due consideration to what it means to "know" of someone else's infringing conduct, particularly when the unlawfulness at issue cannot truly exist until a legal judgment occurs. How can one "know," in other words, that a court or jury will deem a particular use infringement rather than de minimis or fair use? At best, contributory defendants engage in a predictive exercise--in some cases, a more …
Liability For Ai Decision-Making: Some Legal And Ethical Considerations, Iria Giuffrida
Liability For Ai Decision-Making: Some Legal And Ethical Considerations, Iria Giuffrida
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Legal Perspective On The Trials And Tribulations Of Ai: How Artificial Intelligence, The Internet Of Things, Smart Contracts, And Other Technologies Will Affect The Law, Iria Giuffrida, Fredric Lederer, Nicolas Vermeys
A Legal Perspective On The Trials And Tribulations Of Ai: How Artificial Intelligence, The Internet Of Things, Smart Contracts, And Other Technologies Will Affect The Law, Iria Giuffrida, Fredric Lederer, Nicolas Vermeys
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Juries, Social Norms, And Civil Justice, Jason M. Solomon
Juries, Social Norms, And Civil Justice, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
At the root of many contemporary debates and landmark cases in the civil justice system are underlying questions about the role of the civil jury. In prior work, I examined the justifications for the civil jury as a political institution, and found them wanting in our contemporary legal system.
This Article looks closely and critically at the justification for the civil jury as an adjudicative institution and questions the conventional wisdom behind it. The focus is on tort law because the jury has more power to decide questions of law in tort than any other area of law. The Article …
Battle For Disclosure Tort, Jared A. Wilkerson
Battle For Disclosure Tort, Jared A. Wilkerson
W&M Law Student Publications
Legal scholars guided the creation and development of privacy torts, including what would become known as the disclosure tort, for about seventy-five years (1890-1965), a period in which most states came to recognize a common law or statutory right to privacy. Since then, scholarly attempts to curb or modify the tort have yielded little. This Article-beginning with the formalism-realism debate won by Brandeis, Pound, and Prosser and ending with modern experts--shows that notwithstanding enormous efforts by contemporary legal academics, would-be reformers of the disclosure tort have not budged it since Prosser's Restatement (Second). The Article presents both a lesson and …
Norfolk’S Flooding Adaptation Measures: Taking Lawful Precautions Or ‘Takings’ Lawsuits?, Emilie A. Whitehurst
Norfolk’S Flooding Adaptation Measures: Taking Lawful Precautions Or ‘Takings’ Lawsuits?, Emilie A. Whitehurst
Virginia Coastal Policy Center
No abstract provided.
Overview Of A City’S Tort Liability Duties To Maintain And Protect Local Government Services From Sea Level Rise: Poquoson Case Study, Alex Horning
Virginia Coastal Policy Center
No abstract provided.
The Virginia Supreme Court’S 2012 Livingston Case: Localities And The Risk Of “Takings” Claims For Failure To Properly Maintain Flood Control Structures, Daniel Doty, Chris Olcott
The Virginia Supreme Court’S 2012 Livingston Case: Localities And The Risk Of “Takings” Claims For Failure To Properly Maintain Flood Control Structures, Daniel Doty, Chris Olcott
Virginia Coastal Policy Center
No abstract provided.
“Takings” Liability For Vacating Roads In Flood-Prone Areas: Poquoson Case Study, Kelci Block
“Takings” Liability For Vacating Roads In Flood-Prone Areas: Poquoson Case Study, Kelci Block
Virginia Coastal Policy Center
No abstract provided.
The Political Puzzle Of The Civil Jury, Jason M. Solomon
The Political Puzzle Of The Civil Jury, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
At the root of many contemporary debates over the civil justice or tort system—debates over punitive damages, preemption, and tort reform more broadly—are underlying questions about the justification for the civil jury. The United States is the only country that still uses a jury in civil cases, and most civil jury trials are tort trials. The jury has more power to decide questions of law in tort than in any other area of law, so any serious discussion of tort law must have the civil jury at its center.
The debate over the jury—in both the academic literature and the …
Rethinking Oil Spill Compensation Schemes: The Causation Inquiry, Amy D. Paul
Rethinking Oil Spill Compensation Schemes: The Causation Inquiry, Amy D. Paul
Student Award Winning Papers
No abstract provided.
Equal Accountability Through Tort Law, Jason M. Solomon
Equal Accountability Through Tort Law, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Victorian Tort Liability For Workplace Injuries, Michael Ashley Stein
Victorian Tort Liability For Workplace Injuries, Michael Ashley Stein
Faculty Publications
The first decision of an injured worker suing his master for a workplace accident was reported in 1837, the year of Queen Victoria's ascension. The second Workman's Compensation Act, a comprehensive social insurance scheme, was passed in 1900, a few months before her death. The Article provides an initial account of the development of employers' liability to their servants for work-related injuries during the Victorian era. It demonstrates that English judges, and especially the Barons of the Exchequer, interpreted the law to resist employers' liability. The means these judges used included creating the defence of common employment, widely applying the …
Anti-Federalist Procedure, A. Benjamin Spencer
Anti-Federalist Procedure, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
"[T]he new federal government will ... be disinclined to invade the rights of the individual States, or the prerogatives of their governments."
"[T]he Constitution of the United States ... recognizes and preserves the autonomy and independence of the States-independence in their legislative and independence in their judicial departments. . . . Any interference with either, except as [constitutionally] permitted, is an invasion of the authority of the State and, to that extent, a denial of its independence."
The understanding expressed by these opening quotes-that the national government was designed to be one of limited powers that would refrain from encroaching …
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the law of torts, corrective justice is considered the leading moral theory of tort law. It has a significant advantage over instrumental and other moral theories in that it is more consistent with what judges say when they analyze tort law concepts. And with criticism of instrumental accounts, like law and economics, on a number of fronts, it is the leading descriptive theory of tort law. In this Article, I take up a question that has never been answered adequately by corrective-justice or other moral …
Causing Constitutional Harm: How Tort Law Can Help Determine Harmless Error In Criminal Trials, Jason M. Solomon
Causing Constitutional Harm: How Tort Law Can Help Determine Harmless Error In Criminal Trials, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Terminating Calder: "Effects" Based Jurisdiction In The Ninth Circuit After Schwarzenegger V. Fred Martin Motor Co., A. Benjamin Spencer
Terminating Calder: "Effects" Based Jurisdiction In The Ninth Circuit After Schwarzenegger V. Fred Martin Motor Co., A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
In Calder v. Jones, the Supreme Court clearly and succinctly determined that personal jurisdiction is appropriate over a defendant whose only contact with the forum state is its intentional actions aimed at and having harmful "effects" in the forum state. Illustrating the extent to which the law of personal jurisdiction had been relaxed from the time of Pennoyer v. Neff and International Shoe Co. v. Washington, Calder also extended the reach of state courts by permitting jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants on the strength of the plaintiffs' connections with the forum state. Although Calder provided a welcome and much …
Priestley V. Fowler (1837) And The Emerging Tort Of Negligence, Michael Ashley Stein
Priestley V. Fowler (1837) And The Emerging Tort Of Negligence, Michael Ashley Stein
Faculty Publications
Priestly v. Fowler has long been noted as the source of the doctrine of common employment. This Article, however, argues that the case is better understood in the context of the then-emerging independent tort of negligence-specifically, as an unsuccessful attempt to require of masters a duty of care towards their servants. The Article re-examines the facts, arguments, personalities, and various reported versions of the case in tracing the effort to establish a new duty of care. The Article traces, as well, to another case, Hutchinson v. York, the true origins of the common employment doctrine. Finally, the Article compares the …
The Metes And Bounds Of State Sovereign Immunity, Scott Dodson
The Metes And Bounds Of State Sovereign Immunity, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
What are the constitutional parameters of state sovereign immunity? The Court has made clear that certain provisions of Article I contain no authority for overriding state sovereign immunity, while at least one other provision, the Fourteenth Amendment, permits Congress to abrogate the states’ sovereign immunity. How is this constitutional line drawn? It is temporally bound? In other words, are only certain Amendments enacted after the Eleventh Amendment free from absolute subservience to state sovereign immunity? Or, does it divide the original Constitution and its Amendments, meaning that state sovereign immunity permeates the original Constitution but does not infiltrate certain Amendments, …
The Externality Of Victim Care, Alan J. Meese
The Externality Of Victim Care, Alan J. Meese
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
W(H)Ither Warranty: The B(L)Oom Of Products Liability Theory In Cases Of Deficient Software Design, Peter A. Alces
W(H)Ither Warranty: The B(L)Oom Of Products Liability Theory In Cases Of Deficient Software Design, Peter A. Alces
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Doctrine By Any Other Name: The Putative Rejection Of "Crashworthiness" In Virginia Products Liability Law, Paul A. Lebel
A Doctrine By Any Other Name: The Putative Rejection Of "Crashworthiness" In Virginia Products Liability Law, Paul A. Lebel
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Right-Talk And Torts-Talk: A Commentary On The Road Not Taken In The Intellectual History Of Tort Law, Paul A. Lebel
Right-Talk And Torts-Talk: A Commentary On The Road Not Taken In The Intellectual History Of Tort Law, Paul A. Lebel
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Reducing The Recovery Of Avoidable Seat-Belt Damages: A Cure For The Defects Of Waterson V. General Motors Corporation, Paul A. Lebel
Reducing The Recovery Of Avoidable Seat-Belt Damages: A Cure For The Defects Of Waterson V. General Motors Corporation, Paul A. Lebel
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Rights Without Remedies: Judicial Review Of Underinclusive Legislation, Bruce K. Miller, Neal Devins
Constitutional Rights Without Remedies: Judicial Review Of Underinclusive Legislation, Bruce K. Miller, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
When Doctrines Collide: Corporate Negligence And Respondeat Superior When Hospital Employees Fail To Speak Up, I. Trotter Hardy
When Doctrines Collide: Corporate Negligence And Respondeat Superior When Hospital Employees Fail To Speak Up, I. Trotter Hardy
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Contributory Negligence And Mitigation Of Damages: Comparative Negligence Through The Back Door?, Paul A. Lebel
Contributory Negligence And Mitigation Of Damages: Comparative Negligence Through The Back Door?, Paul A. Lebel
Popular Media
No abstract provided.