Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts

PDF

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

2005

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Summary Of May V. Anderson, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 67, Patty L. Roberts Sep 2005

Summary Of May V. Anderson, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 67, Patty L. Roberts

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

This case is an appeal from a judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, finding a settlement agreement between the parties to be valid and entering judgment in accordance with that agreement.


Summary Of Carver V. El-Sabawi, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 3, Kathleen L. Fellows Mar 2005

Summary Of Carver V. El-Sabawi, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 3, Kathleen L. Fellows

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal from a district court judgment challenging a jury instruction, which included both a “mere happening instruction” and a res ipsa loquitur instruction, in a medical malpractice case.


Summary Of Langon V. Matamoros, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 16, Scott Mcdonald Jan 2005

Summary Of Langon V. Matamoros, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 16, Scott Mcdonald

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

NRS 41.133, which mandates that a conviction of a crime resulting in injury to the victim is conclusive evidence of civil liability for the injury, does not apply to misdemeanor traffic offenses.2


Summary Of Morsicato V. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc., 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 18, Danielle Oakley Jan 2005

Summary Of Morsicato V. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc., 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 18, Danielle Oakley

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

This case is an appeal from a final district court judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of Defendant/Respondent in a pharmacy malpractice action.


Summary Of Jacobson V. Estate Of Clayton, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 53, 119 P.3d 132, Scott Mcdonald Jan 2005

Summary Of Jacobson V. Estate Of Clayton, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 53, 119 P.3d 132, Scott Mcdonald

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Nevada Revised Statute 140.040 specifically allows suits against a special administrator, in place of probate proceedings, when the estate’s sole asset is a liability insurance policy.