Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Torts (5)
- Louisiana (2)
- Mass torts (2)
- Admiralty (1)
- Adultery (1)
-
- BP PLC (1)
- Breach of contract (1)
- Class Actions (1)
- Collateral source rule (1)
- Corporate bankruptcy (1)
- Deepwater Horizon (Drilling rig) (1)
- Discrimination in employment -- Law & legislation -- United States (1)
- Discrimination in employment -- United States -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services Inc. (Supreme Court case) (1)
- Home Depot Inc. -- Trials; litigation; etc. (1)
- Husband & wife (1)
- Intentional torts (1)
- Jury decision making (1)
- LGBT people (1)
- Labor laws (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Liability for condition & use of land (1)
- Louisiana. Supreme Court (1)
- Multidistrict litigation (1)
- Negligence -- Lawsuits & claims (1)
- Obedience (Law) (1)
- Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (U.S.) (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sieracki Lives: A Portrait Of The Interplay Between Legislation And The Judicially Created General Maritime Law, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Sieracki Lives: A Portrait Of The Interplay Between Legislation And The Judicially Created General Maritime Law, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Journal Articles
In American maritime law, the interplay between the courts and Congress is complex and iterative. A significant body of American admiralty law, the general maritime law, has been judicially created and developed. But Congress has also enacted a number of important statutes governing maritime commerce and the rights of maritime workers, such as the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act (“LHWCA”). The back and forth between the courts and Congress in interpreting those statutes and gauging their impact on and consistency with the general maritime law is ongoing. One important area where the courts development of the general maritime law …
The Great Escape: Exploring Chapter 11’S Allure To Mass Tort Defendants, Natalie R. Earles
The Great Escape: Exploring Chapter 11’S Allure To Mass Tort Defendants, Natalie R. Earles
Louisiana Law Review
The article explores Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings as a defense strategy used by mass tort defendants to escape unfavorable litigation and proposes the U.S. Congress to revise the Bankruptcy Code to disincentivize the misuse of bankruptcy power.
Close, But No Cigar: Issues With Louisiana Revised Statutes § 9:2800.27 And The Collateral Source Rule, Andrew G. Jarreau
Close, But No Cigar: Issues With Louisiana Revised Statutes § 9:2800.27 And The Collateral Source Rule, Andrew G. Jarreau
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses issues on the collateral source rule in Louisiana, the ruling by the state Supreme Court in the case Bozeman v. State, and why the state's Revised Statutes  9:2800.27 contradicts the policy behind tort recovery.
Consortium And Workers’ Compensation: The Demolition Of Consortium, Michael Green, David M. Layman
Consortium And Workers’ Compensation: The Demolition Of Consortium, Michael Green, David M. Layman
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses issues on spousal consortium claims and workers' compensation in the U.S., including the aspects of compensation for accidental injuries and tort claims.
The Sharing Revolution: Changing Times Call For Clarifying Tort Liability, Cecilia G. Vazquez
The Sharing Revolution: Changing Times Call For Clarifying Tort Liability, Cecilia G. Vazquez
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses the need to reform tort liability laws in the U.S. to resolve the legal ambiguities with respect to the liabilities of sharing-economy companies and other players in the industry.
Let The Jury Decide! A Plea For The Proper Allocation Of Decision-Making Authority In Louisiana Negligence Cases, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Let The Jury Decide! A Plea For The Proper Allocation Of Decision-Making Authority In Louisiana Negligence Cases, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
The Structure Of Torts, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
The Structure Of Torts, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Journal Articles
Tort law consists of a number of different causes of action which are seemingly unrelated except that all involve civil wrongs, other than mere breaches of contract. The various torts have different elements; some, like the nominate or intentional torts, very specific; others, like negligence, more general and vague. There is no apparent, coherent, or consistent structure applicable to all torts. This Article articulates just such a unified structure for all torts: one that arises out of and is based upon the elements of negligence. All torts involve the judicial delineation of the defendant's duty or legal obligation. All torts …
The Bp Mdl And Its Aftermath: Whither Opa's Displacement Jurisprudence?, John Costonis
The Bp Mdl And Its Aftermath: Whither Opa's Displacement Jurisprudence?, John Costonis
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Finding A Better Way Around Employment At Will: Protecting Employees' Autonomy Interests Through Tort Law, William Corbett
Finding A Better Way Around Employment At Will: Protecting Employees' Autonomy Interests Through Tort Law, William Corbett
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Constitutionalizing Class Certification, Margaret S. Thomas
Constitutionalizing Class Certification, Margaret S. Thomas
Journal Articles
While class actions have been in decline in federal mass tort litigation since at least the 1990s, a quiet shift has been occurring in their landscape in state courts. Although most scholarly attention has been focused on federal courts and on the U.S. Supreme Court’s reworking of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in the aftermath of the Class Action Fairness Act, state supreme courts have been engaged in a little-noticed but tremendously important battle over the future of class certification.
Defendants in non-removable class actions in state courts have increasingly shifted their arguments against class certification from objections based …
Parens Patriae And The States' Historic Police Power, Margaret S. Thomas
Parens Patriae And The States' Historic Police Power, Margaret S. Thomas
Journal Articles
Class actions have long been contracting as procedural vehicles in mass tort litigation. At the same time, parens patriae actions brought by state attorneys general for injuries to their state’s citizenry have been expanding. This form of public dispute has emerged as a full-fledged alternative form of aggregate litigation in mass torts. The use of this public alternative is already widespread in consumer, antitrust, environmental, and health law cases.
Despite the widespread use of parens patriae litigation by states, the source of the power to sue in this way is vague and ill-defined. Courts have struggled to articulate and explain …
Recent Developments: Broussard V. State And The Not So Obvious Application Of The Open And Obvious Doctrine, John M. Church
Recent Developments: Broussard V. State And The Not So Obvious Application Of The Open And Obvious Doctrine, John M. Church
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses Louisiana Supreme Court tort case Broussard v. State based on the open and obvious doctrine. Topics discussed include procedural history of Broussard case, Court case Murray v. Ramada Inns Inc. and the U.S Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in case Michalski v. Home Depot. It informs that the open and obvious doctrine eliminates landowner liability to business visitors resulting from open and obvious dangers restatement.
What Is Troubling About The Tortification Of Employment Discrimination Law?, William Corbett
What Is Troubling About The Tortification Of Employment Discrimination Law?, William Corbett
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
A Somewhat Modest Proposal To Prevent Adultery And Save Families: Two Old Torts Looking For A New Career, William R. Corbett
A Somewhat Modest Proposal To Prevent Adultery And Save Families: Two Old Torts Looking For A New Career, William R. Corbett
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.