Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States. Supreme Court (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Law Enforcement (2)
- Searches and Seizures (2)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (2)
-
- Abortion (1)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (1)
- Confirmation hearings (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Injunctions (1)
- Louisiana (1)
- Mexican-American border region (1)
- Name Trademarks (1)
- Nominations (1)
- Originalism (Constitutional Interpretation) (1)
- Police Shootings (1)
- Remedies (Law) (1)
- Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)) (1)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1)
- Senate (1)
- Stare Decisis (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Supreme Court Justices (1)
- Textualism (Legal Interpretation) (1)
- Third Parties (Law) (1)
- Trademark Lawsuits (1)
- Trademarks (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Argument Analysis: Justices Spar Over Stare Decisis, Originalism, Text And What Counts As A Fourth Amendment “Seizure”, Jeffrey Bellin
Argument Analysis: Justices Spar Over Stare Decisis, Originalism, Text And What Counts As A Fourth Amendment “Seizure”, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Case Preview: When Is A Fleeing Suspect “Seized”?, Jeffrey Bellin
Case Preview: When Is A Fleeing Suspect “Seized”?, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable “searches” and “seizures.” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in Torres v. Madrid, a case that will provide important guidance on what constitutes a Fourth Amendment seizure. Here’s a rundown of the case starting with the relevant facts and procedural history, followed by a discussion of the legal issues and finally a couple of things to watch for at the argument.
Senators Treat Female Supreme Court Nominees Differently. Here’S The Evidence., Lori A. Ringhand, Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr.
Senators Treat Female Supreme Court Nominees Differently. Here’S The Evidence., Lori A. Ringhand, Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr.
Popular Media
Over the weekend, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat left empty by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has promised to move the nomination swiftly through to confirmation. As a result, the nation’s attention will soon turn to Barrett’s confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Based on our empirical examinations of every question asked and every answer given at the hearings since the first in 1939, here is what to expect.
As She Lies In State, A Tribute To Justice Ginsburg, Katherine Mims Crocker
As She Lies In State, A Tribute To Justice Ginsburg, Katherine Mims Crocker
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
United States Patent And Trademark Office V. Booking.Com B.V.: How Do We Know When Something Is A Name?, Laura A. Heymann
United States Patent And Trademark Office V. Booking.Com B.V.: How Do We Know When Something Is A Name?, Laura A. Heymann
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Abortion Case May Not Overturn Roe, But Could Effectively Nullify It, A. Benjamin Spencer
Abortion Case May Not Overturn Roe, But Could Effectively Nullify It, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Justices Make The Tough-- But Right-- Call In Cross-Border Shooting Case, A. Benjamin Spencer
Justices Make The Tough-- But Right-- Call In Cross-Border Shooting Case, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
First, We'll Neuter All The Judges, A. Benjamin Spencer
First, We'll Neuter All The Judges, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.