Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Press As An Interest Group: Mainstream Media In The United States Supreme Court, Eric Easton
The Press As An Interest Group: Mainstream Media In The United States Supreme Court, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
There can be little doubt that the institutional press is an interest group to be reckoned with in the Supreme Court, its aversion to such a designation notwithstanding. Over the past century, and especially since 1964, the press has secured for itself the greatest legal protection available anywhere in the world. While some of that protection has come from Congress, by far the greatest share has come from the Supreme Court's expansive interpretation of the First Amendment's Press Clause. Although the role of the press in American politics has been studied extensively for nearly two centuries, the role of the …
After 150 Years, Worst Supreme Court Decision Ever Continues To Haunt, F. Michael Higginbotham
After 150 Years, Worst Supreme Court Decision Ever Continues To Haunt, F. Michael Higginbotham
All Faculty Scholarship
In 1857, the Supreme Court rendered a decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, declaring that it had no jurisdiction to hear Dred Scott's claim to freedom because he was black and, therefore, not a citizen of the United States. This article argues that not only was the decision morally reprehensible, it was also based on an erroneous interpretation of the Constitution.
Foreword, Joel K. Goldstein
Foreword, Joel K. Goldstein
All Faculty Scholarship
Few cases in American history have engendered such controversy as has the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade.1 Since its issuance in January 1973, scholars in various disciplines, as well as lay people, have subjected the decision to vigorous debate. That discussion continues in a host of fora, but not in the pages which follow in this volume.