Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Andrew Parra (1)
- Brain science (1)
- Chaise Edebiri (1)
- Children (1)
- Clinical psychology (1)
-
- Dagny Rippon (1)
- Dean Christiana Ochoa (1)
- Financial aid (1)
- Financial support (1)
- John Paul Stevens Foundation (1)
- Law school internships (1)
- Lulu Faulk (1)
- Maurer School of Law (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public interest law (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Social justice (1)
- Social psychology (1)
- Stevens Fellows (1)
- Summer funding (1)
- Summer legal internships (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Four Maurer School Of Law Students Selected As 2023 Stevens Fellows, James Owsley Boyd
Four Maurer School Of Law Students Selected As 2023 Stevens Fellows, James Owsley Boyd
Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)
Four Indiana Law students have been selected as Stevens Fellows, the John Paul Stevens Foundation accounced today (June 20). Selection as a Stevens Fellow allows students to receive critical financial support while participating in unpaid summer legal internships serving the public interest.
Named after the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice, the John Paul Stevens Foundation is dedicated to promoting public interest and social justice values in the next generation of American lawyers.
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Article explores how Justice Antonin Scalia’s hostility to psychology, antipathy to granting children autonomous rights, and dismissiveness of children’s interior lives both affected his jurisprudence and was a natural outgrowth of it. Justice Scalia expressed a skeptical, one might even say hostile, attitude towards psychology and its practitioners. Justice Scalia’s cynicism about the discipline and the therapists who practice it is particularly interesting regarding legal and policy arguments concerning children. His love of tradition and his rigid and unempathetic approach to children clash with modern notions of child psychology. Justice Scalia’s attitude towards psychology helps to explain his jurisprudence, …