Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Barring Slayers' Acquisition of Property Rights in Virginia: A Proposed Statute (1)
- Consistency and Predictability: Supreme Court Antitrust Decisions During the 1978 Term (1)
- Discovery in Virginia By William Hamilton Bryson (1)
- Evans v. Newton (1)
- FlaggBros. Inc. (1)
-
- Gilmore v. City of Montgomery (1)
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co (1)
- Marsh v. Alabama (1)
- Michies (1)
- Minority Quotas in Law and Medicine By George H. Jaffin (1)
- Nicholas v. Harrisonburg Building and Supply Co. (1)
- Nixon v. Condon (1)
- Notes on Virginia Civil Procedur (1)
- Notes on Virginia Civil Procedure By W. Hamilton Bryson (1)
- Pomeroy (1)
- Professional Ethics and Trial Publicity: Another Constitutional Attack on DR7-107-Hirschkop v. Snead (1)
- Regulation of Consumer Credit in Virginia: A Suggestion for Legislative Improvement (1)
- Runkle v. Runkle (1)
- T. C. Williams School of Law (1)
- Terry v. Adams (1)
- The FCC Cable TV and Visions of Valhalla: Judicial Scrutiny of Complex Rulemaking and Institutional Competence (1)
- The History of Legal Education in Virginia (1)
- Tribute to J. Westwood Smithers (1)
- V. Brooks (1)
- W. Hamilton Bryson (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Notes On Virginia Civil Procedure By W. Hamilton Bryson, Lewis T. Booker
Notes On Virginia Civil Procedure By W. Hamilton Bryson, Lewis T. Booker
University of Richmond Law Review
Although W. Hamilton Bryson modestly describes his Notes on Virginia Civil Procedure,the Michie Company, 1979, as "little more than an outline," he has in fact made a significant contribution to practical jurisprudence in his handbook on Virginia civil procedure. Mr. Bryson is a professor of law at the T. C. Williams School of Law of the University of Richmond and teaches Virginia Procedure there.
Interpleader In Virginia, Stephen E. Baril
Interpleader In Virginia, Stephen E. Baril
University of Richmond Law Review
Interpleader is a joinder device employed by a stakeholder (as the obligor is called) who does not know to which of several claimants he is or may be liable. It allows him to bring all of the claimants into a single proceeding, and to require them to litigate among themselves to determine who, if any, has a valid claim to the stake.
State Action And The Public Function Doctrine: Are There Really Public Functions?, William A. Diamond
State Action And The Public Function Doctrine: Are There Really Public Functions?, William A. Diamond
University of Richmond Law Review
FlaggBros., Inc., v. Brooks is the latest in a series of cases pertaining to the issue of state action. In that case, the Court decided that "dispute resolution" was not a public function such that the actions of a private party must adhere to constitutional standards. Mr. Justice Rehnquist, in delivering the opinion of the Court, added that, when considering such functions as education, police and fire protection, and tax collection: "We express no view as to the extent, if any, to which a city or State might be free to delegate to private parties the performance of such functions …
Book Reviews, Edward S. Graves, David L. Ross
Book Reviews, Edward S. Graves, David L. Ross
University of Richmond Law Review
These are book reviews from 1979.
University Of Richmond Law Review Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Review Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.