Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adm'r. v. Scarborough (1)
- Burruss v. Baldwin (1)
- Cadell v. Palmer (1)
- Can an Equitable Interest Held in Trust Be Transferred Wrongfully by the Trustee Free of the Trust? (1)
- Chesapeake and Ohio By. Co. v. Saunder's Adm'r (1)
-
- Collateral Attack on Foreign (1)
- Cook v. Shoulder (1)
- Corroboration of Confessions in a Criminal Case in Virginia (1)
- Davies v. Mann (1)
- Davis (1)
- Duke of Norfolk's Case (1)
- Dun v. Seaboard and Roanoke R. R. Co. (1)
- Ex Parte Divorce Decrees: A Virginia Case (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Future Interests (1)
- Greearv. Noland Co (1)
- Griffith v. Thompson (1)
- Harris Motor Lines (1)
- Hopkins v. Grimshaw (1)
- Inc. v. Green (1)
- Irginia's Drear Aridities: Its Rule of Perpetuities (1)
- New York Legislative Document (1)
- New York Tribune (1)
- Rose v. Rose (1)
- Skeen v. Clinchfield Coal Corp. (1)
- State Taxation of the Net Income from Interstate Business (1)
- Thomson v. Shakespeare (1)
- University of Richmond Law Notes (1)
- Virginia Law (1)
- Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Foreward, William T. Muse
Foreward, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
The reception accorded the first number of the University of Richmond Law Notes, published last spring, has been most gratifying. It has encouraged the Faculty to prepare this second number, which also is being distributed to all alumni of the Law School through the courtesy of the University of Richmond Law School Association. There has been a modest volume of requests for copies of the first issue from non-alumni members of the bar and from many law libraries.
Virginia's Drear Aridities: Its Rule Of Perpetuities, D. Orville Lahy
Virginia's Drear Aridities: Its Rule Of Perpetuities, D. Orville Lahy
University of Richmond Law Review
Whereas most Virginia lawyers know about the rule against perpetuities, many of the same lawyers do not know what it is all about. Perpetuities is a dry and dismal subject to an active practitioner, and the state of abject bewilderment with which he was indoctrinated about the rule against perpetuities while in law school lingers on to haunt his memory. for the balance of his professional career. It is not until an actual client appears with a perpetuities problem that the same practitioner is forced to face the stark realities of the rule. It is only then that the complexities …
Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine, William T. Muse
Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
Rule # 1. Where the injured person has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically unable to remove himself, the defendant is liable if he saw, or should have seen, him [and realized, or ought to have realized, his peril] in time to avert the accident by using reasonable care. 'Rule # 2. Where the plainfiff has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically able to remove himself, but is unconscious of his peril, the defendant is liable only if he saw the plaintiff and realized, or ought …
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.