Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment (1)
- City of Trenton v. New Jersey (1)
- Crime displacement (1)
- Crime prevention (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
-
- Criminal statistics (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Government liability (1)
- Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh (1)
- Jurisdictional competition (1)
- Municipal corporations (1)
- Political subdivisions (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Supremacy Clause (1)
- Threshold effect (1)
- United States v. Lopez (1)
- War on crime (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Michigan Law Review
Policymakers' false beliefs about capital punishment's universal deterrent effect may have caused many people to die needlessly. If deterrence is capital punishment's purpose then, in the majority of states where executions do not deter crime, executions kill convicts uselessly. Moreover, in the many states where the brutalization effect outweighs the deterrent effect, executions not only kill convicts needlessly but also induce the additional murders of many innocent people. After Part II discusses capital punishment's recent history in the United States, Part III reviews the conflict in recent studies on capital punishment and deterrence. Part IV explores differences in states' applications …
The Market For Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, And Jurisdictional Competition, Doron Teichman
The Market For Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, And Jurisdictional Competition, Doron Teichman
Michigan Law Review
Part I introduces the concepts of jurisdictional competition and crime displacement and argues that, as a positive matter, a decentralized criminal justice system may create a competitive process among the different units composing it, in which each such unit attempts to divert crime to neighboring communities. Part II then turns to evaluate the normative aspects of jurisdictional competition in the area of criminal justice. In this context I will show that competition can have both advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, the forces of competition might drive jurisdictions to fight crime efficiently, since any jurisdiction that functions inefficiently will suffer …
Subdivisions, Standing And The Supremacy Clause: Can A Political Subdivision Sue Its Parent State Under Federal Law, Brian P. Keenan
Subdivisions, Standing And The Supremacy Clause: Can A Political Subdivision Sue Its Parent State Under Federal Law, Brian P. Keenan
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that political subdivisions should be able to seek protection from their parent states under the Supremacy Clause when alleging a conflict between state law and any federal law, be it the Constitution, treaty, or a federal statute. Part I argues that the precedential cases like Hunter and Trenton were limited to the constitutional provisions in question and therefore did not bar all suits under the Supremacy Clause. Part II shows that the issue is one of constitutional protection of political subdivisions, rather than Article III standing, which had a completely different meaning when Hunter and Trenton were …