Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

State and Local Government Law

Golden Gate University School of Law

Series

1954

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1954

Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Where cement company and lessor had adequate remedy at law to review planning commission proceedings they were not entitled to injunctive or declaratory relief to prohibit the county from enforcing zoning ordinances to remove existing businesses.


Blotter V. Farrell, Jesse W. Carter May 1954

Blotter V. Farrell, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The city's power to legislate included, by necessary implication, the power to amend existing legislation, including the power to redistrict. Further, an initiative petition was a proper method of proposing such legislation.


Taenaka V. State Board Of Equalization, Jesse W. Carter Apr 1954

Taenaka V. State Board Of Equalization, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A man of Japanese ancestry was entitled to the return of his liquor license to rectify what the legislature felt was an injustice of the deprivation of persons of Japanese ancestry of liquor licenses held by them upon the ground of their ancestry.


San Diego V. Southern California Tel. Corp. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

San Diego V. Southern California Tel. Corp. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In computing gross receipts to determine the amount to be paid by a telephone company for using public streets, a ratio based on relative investment was necessary and only the allocation of receipts for the actual franchise area was allowed.


County Of Los Angeles V. Southern Counties Gas Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

County Of Los Angeles V. Southern Counties Gas Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The governing statute allowed the public utility to retain 100 percent of its gross receipts from its private property not subject to franchise charges, as well as 98 percent of its gross receipts arising from the use of the franchises in a county.