Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
People Ex Rel. Department Of Public Works V. Russell [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People Ex Rel. Department Of Public Works V. Russell [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Award of severance damages for landowner's non-abutting parcel in condemnation case was vacated because county road relocation did not impair landowner's easement on parcel but was an inconvenience suffered as member of public and was noncompensable.
Glendale V. Trondsen, Jesse W. Carter
Glendale V. Trondsen, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A charge for rubbish collection that was imposed by a city ordinance was a reasonable exercise of the police power. Residents received the benefit of rubbish collection availability notwithstanding fact that they chose not to use the services.
Wilson V. Beville, Jesse W. Carter
Wilson V. Beville, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Landowner was not required to file a claim with the city before obtaining compensation for taking a part of his property for a public street easement under the doctrine of inverse condemnation.
Walnut Creek V. Silveira, Jesse W. Carter
Walnut Creek V. Silveira, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Limited Obligation Bond Law was a valid general law because it related to a municipal affair by providing new streets to provide for the greatly increased traffic circulation in commercial area and general fund was not liable for payment of bonds.
Santa Barbara County Water Agency V. All Persons & Parties [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Santa Barbara County Water Agency V. All Persons & Parties [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Trial court properly declared validity of existence of county water agency and member units, but improperly declared contracts valid because excess land provisions in contracts would have constituted denials of due process and equal protection.