Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Handler V. Board Of Supervisors, Jesse W. Carter
Handler V. Board Of Supervisors, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A county was authorized by statute to oppose a commuter railroad's application for a passenger-fare rate increase and to hire an attorney to represent the county in opposing the rate increase.
Fascination, Inc. V. Hoover, Jesse W. Carter
Fascination, Inc. V. Hoover, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The right to engage in business in the city for whom the officials worked could not be arbitrarily denied by the city's officials without a hearing or an opportunity to present the merits of the application.
Anderson V. Souza [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Anderson V. Souza [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Finding that operation of airport constituted a nuisance under the State Aeronautics Commission Act was proper because its operation interfered with rights of neighboring land owners, but remedy of enjoining the operation of airport was too severe.
Culver City V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Culver City V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
When city violated injunction which required it to contribute to the costs of new sewage facilities, city's inability to agree to a contract with the sewage treatment provider was not a reasonable excuse, and city and its council were in contempt.
Stang V. Mill Valley [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Stang V. Mill Valley [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Because the city and its officials owed to the homeowners no specific duty to maintain the waterways to a fire hydrant, the homeowners had no claim against the city and its officials arising from the blaze that destroyed the homeowners' dwelling.