Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abington School District v. Schempp (1)
- Adolescent Family Life Act (1)
- Aguilar v. Felton (1)
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School District (1)
- Board of Education v. Allen (1)
-
- Bowen v. Kendrick (1)
- Braunfeld v. Brown (1)
- Caldor v. Thornton (1)
- Cantwell v. Connecticut (1)
- Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (1)
- Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (1)
- County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union (1)
- Criteria Discussion Document (1)
- Critical Areas Act (1)
- Davis v. Beason (1)
- Dillon Rule (1)
- Epperson v. Arkansas (1)
- Goldman v. Weinberger (1)
- GrandRapids School District v. Ball (1)
- Horace Mann League v. Board of Public Works (1)
- Hunt v. McNair (1)
- Legal Issues Affecting Local Governments in Implementing the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (1)
- Lemon v. Kurtzman (1)
- Lynch v. Donnelly (1)
- McCollum v. Board of Education (1)
- McGowan v. Maryland (1)
- Mueller v. Allen (1)
- NAACP v. Button (1)
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1)
- Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Response To Legal Issues Affecting Local Governments In Implementing The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, W. Taylor Murphy Jr., Michael Mckenney
Response To Legal Issues Affecting Local Governments In Implementing The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, W. Taylor Murphy Jr., Michael Mckenney
University of Richmond Law Review
The article Legal Issues Affecting Local Governments in Implementing the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (Legal Issues or "the article") adds measurably to the growing literature on the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act ("the Act") and offers a significant amount of historical background. However, inasmuch as the article attempts to ascribe certain areas of legislative intent on the part of the General Assembly in adopting the Act that the authors of this comment believe are inaccurate, this comment will attempt to clarify those areas of legislative and regulatory intent. Additionally, this comment will discuss the regulatory development process of the Chesapeake Bay …
State Action Under The Religion Clauses: Neutral In Result Or Neutral In Treatment?, David K. Dewolf
State Action Under The Religion Clauses: Neutral In Result Or Neutral In Treatment?, David K. Dewolf
University of Richmond Law Review
The United States Supreme Court's treatment of the first amendment's religion clauses over the last fifty years has generated considerable controversy. While few religion clause cases reached the Supreme Court prior to 1940, the number steadily multiplied once the first amendment was incorporated into the fourteenth amendment. The Court's doctrinal development was incremental and uncertain, but by 1971 the Court had developed a test for each of the religion clauses to evaluate the constitutionality of challenged state action. Although these tests have not been followed with perfect fidelity, they have been the starting point for virtually all of the religion …