Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1940 Act (1)
- ALJ (1)
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Administrative state (1)
- Advantage (1)
-
- Amortized (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Board (1)
- Bright line (1)
- Broke the buck (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Cash (1)
- Debt (1)
- Decker Coal (1)
- Deviation (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Dual-tiered removal protections (1)
- Fees (1)
- First mover (1)
- For-cause (1)
- Form N-CR (1)
- Free Enterprise Fund (1)
- Gates (1)
- Government (1)
- Investment Company Act of 1940 (1)
- Jarkesy (1)
- Lehman Brothers (1)
- Liquidation (1)
- Liquidity (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Administrative Law Judges And The Erosion Of The Administrative State: Why Jarkesy May Be The Straw That Breaks The Camel's Back, Nicholas D'Addio
Administrative Law Judges And The Erosion Of The Administrative State: Why Jarkesy May Be The Straw That Breaks The Camel's Back, Nicholas D'Addio
Catholic University Law Review
The Trump-era unitary executive movement sought to expand presidential
power and shrink the influence of the administrative state through deregulation.
This movement ripples into the present moment, as Trump’s overhaul of the
federal judiciary installed a comprehensive system to delegitimize
administrative agency action— a system that is certain to endure. The
independence and role of administrative law judges (ALJs) has proven a key
target of the movement. Most recently, in the 2022 case of Jarkesy v. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the Fifth Circuit held that the dual-tiered for-cause
removal protections of SEC ALJs violated the Take Care Clause of Article …
A Look Back In Time: Analyzing The Success And Value Of The 2014 Amendments To Rule 2a-7 And Reporting On Form N-Cr In Light Of The March 2020 Market Events, Jocelyn Near
Catholic University Law Review
Money market funds have frequently been a target of regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Perhaps the most expansive regulation came as a response to the 2008 financial crisis, in which the Reserve Primary Fund “broke the buck.” The SEC’s misguided 2014 reforms exacerbated the inherent risks of money market funds, including the risk of runs and first mover advantage, particularly with the implementation of Form N-CR. Form N-CR requires a money market fund to publicly report when various events occur, including when a retail or government money market fund’s current net asset value per share deviates downward …