Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (2)
- Radioactivity (2)
- Atomic Energy Commission (1)
- Atomic energy (1)
- By-product material (1)
-
- Defense power (1)
- Electrical Workers v. United States (1)
- Federal preemption (1)
- Federal supremacy (1)
- Intergovernmental problem (1)
- Liability (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Nuclear (1)
- Nuclear reactor (1)
- Nuclear technology (1)
- Radioactive material (1)
- Regulation (1)
- State highway (1)
- Tenth Amendment (1)
- United States v. Darby (1)
- Wickard v. Filburn (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
State Control Of Radiation Hazards: An Intergovernmental Relations Problem, Samuel D. Estep, Martin Adelman
State Control Of Radiation Hazards: An Intergovernmental Relations Problem, Samuel D. Estep, Martin Adelman
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is to set forth the nature of the intergovernmental problem. This involves an analysis of the extent and limitations of federal power, a determination of congressional intent on the issue of federal pre-emption, and an appraisal of the steps now being taken by the Atomic Energy Commission to turn over part of the radiation safety regulatory program to the states.
Stason, Estep And Pierce: Atoms And The Law, Harry Kalven, Jr.
Stason, Estep And Pierce: Atoms And The Law, Harry Kalven, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Atoms and the Law. By E. Blythe Stason, Samuel D. Estep and William J. Pierce. [Parts I and II* Pp. 1-846]
Atomic Energy Law-Atomic Energy Act Of 1954- Substantial Legal Restrictions On The Private Development Of Nuclear Reactors, Martin Adelman
Atomic Energy Law-Atomic Energy Act Of 1954- Substantial Legal Restrictions On The Private Development Of Nuclear Reactors, Martin Adelman
Michigan Law Review
In 1956 the Power Reactor Development Company received a construction permit from the Atomic Energy Commission to build a fast breeder nuclear reactor at Lagoona Beach, thirty miles southwest of Detroit, Michigan. Intervening pursuant to section 189 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, several unions claimed that the health, safety, and property of their members would be jeopardized by the operation of the reactor. Formal hearings were held before the AEC and a final decision affirming the issuance of a construction permit to PRDC was made by the Commission in 1959. On appeal to the Court of Appeals for …