Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Change (1)
- Citizen participation (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Constitutional amendments (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Economic Philosophy (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Government (1)
- History (1)
- Individuals (1)
- Intent (1)
- Legal analysis (1)
- Pleading and proof (1)
- Public policy (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Values (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Burdens Of Pleading And Proof In Discrimination Cases: Toward A Theory Of Procedural Justice, Robert Belton
Burdens Of Pleading And Proof In Discrimination Cases: Toward A Theory Of Procedural Justice, Robert Belton
Vanderbilt Law Review
If the national policy of eliminating discrimination is to be achieved, the courts--to whom the major responsibility for effectuating this goal is delegated--must establish a coherent framework for allocating the burdens of pleading and proof that provides "a sensible, orderly way to evaluate the evidence in light of common experience as it bears on the critical question of discrimination."' The purpose of this Article, therefore, is to propose such a coherent approach to the allocation of the burdens of pleading and proof in discrimination cases. Towards this end, part II of the Article examines the definitional and operational effect of …
In Search Of A General Approach To Legal Analysis: A Comparative Institutional Alternative, Neil Komesar
In Search Of A General Approach To Legal Analysis: A Comparative Institutional Alternative, Neil Komesar
Michigan Law Review
This Article is an attempt to aid in the construction of such a general approach to legal analysis. Its central thesis is that all legal decisions share a fundamental feature that should be a basic building block for any general analytic approach: they all involve a choice among imperfect alternative decision-making institutions. In all cases, legal decision makers must consider the relative merits or attributes of the alternative institutions. The analyst of legal decisions, therefore, should adopt a "comparative institutional" approach, which can be simply stated as follows: the determinants of legal decisions can best be analyzed when legal decision …
Constitutional Interpretation, Terrance Sandalow
Constitutional Interpretation, Terrance Sandalow
Articles
"[We] must never forget," Chief Justice Marshall admonished us in a statement pregnant with more than one meaning, "that it is a constitution we are expounding."' Marshall meant that the Constitution should be read as a document "intended to endure for ages.to come, and, consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs."'2 But he meant also that the construction placed upon the document must have regard for its "great outlines" and "important objects."'3 Limits are implied by the very nature of the task. There is not the same freedom in construing the Constitution as in constructing a …
The Plea Bargain In England And America: A Comparative Institutional Approach, Richard Adelstein
The Plea Bargain In England And America: A Comparative Institutional Approach, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
A comparative view of adjudication by guilty plea in the US and the UK.
Institutional Function And Evolution In The Criminal Process, Richard Adelstein
Institutional Function And Evolution In The Criminal Process, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
An extended development of the foundations of the price exaction model of the criminal process.