Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Property Law: 1995 Survey Of Florida Law, Ronald B. Brown, Joseph M. Grohman, Manuel R. Valcarcel Iv Oct 1995

Property Law: 1995 Survey Of Florida Law, Ronald B. Brown, Joseph M. Grohman, Manuel R. Valcarcel Iv

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Takings Clause Jan 1995

Takings Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause And The Political Process, William Michael Treanor Jan 1995

The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause And The Political Process, William Michael Treanor

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The original understanding of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was clear on two points. The clause required compensation when the federal government physically took private property, but not when government regulations limited the ways in which property could be used. In 1922, however, the Supreme Court's decision in Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon established a new takings regime. In an opinion by Justice Holmes, the Court held that compensation must be provided when government regulation "goes too far" in diminishing the value of private property. Since that decision, the Supreme Court has been unable to define clearly what kind …


Takings Law And The Regulatory State: A Response To R.S. Radford, William Michael Treanor Jan 1995

Takings Law And The Regulatory State: A Response To R.S. Radford, William Michael Treanor

Fordham Urban Law Journal

In the Winter 1994 issue of the Fordham Urban Law Journal, R.S. Radford reviewed Dennis Coyle's book "Property Rights and the Constitution." Radford's theory relies on the idea that property rights deserve greater constitutional protection than they have received in the 60 years since the Supreme Court accepted the legitimacy of the regulatory state. This article reviews Radford's interpretation and criticism of Coyle's theory, analyzes Radford's theories in light of recent cases, and discussed the constitutional implications of Radford's analysis and how they relate to the economic regulations that they empower.