Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 14 of 14

Full-Text Articles in Law

Foreword, Kevin Dorse Nov 1986

Foreword, Kevin Dorse

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Two Faces Of Liberalism, Cass R. Sunstein Nov 1986

Two Faces Of Liberalism, Cass R. Sunstein

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Malthusian Constitution, Thomas C. Grey Nov 1986

The Malthusian Constitution, Thomas C. Grey

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Last Word On Eminent Domain, Richard A. Epstein Nov 1986

A Last Word On Eminent Domain, Richard A. Epstein

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Reflection On Epstein And His Critics, Ellen Frankel Paul Nov 1986

A Reflection On Epstein And His Critics, Ellen Frankel Paul

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


An Outline Of Takings, Richard A. Epstein Nov 1986

An Outline Of Takings, Richard A. Epstein

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Takings Of Property And Constitutional Serendipity, Larry Alexander Nov 1986

Takings Of Property And Constitutional Serendipity, Larry Alexander

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Consequences Of Conceptualism, Margaret Jane Radin Nov 1986

The Consequences Of Conceptualism, Margaret Jane Radin

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Proceedings Of The Conference On Takings Of Property And The Constitution Nov 1986

Proceedings Of The Conference On Takings Of Property And The Constitution

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Hodel V. Irving, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1986

Hodel V. Irving, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Water Transfers And Exchanges: Using The Market To Improve Water Use—A Legal/Institutional View, Gary D. Weatherford Jun 1986

Water Transfers And Exchanges: Using The Market To Improve Water Use—A Legal/Institutional View, Gary D. Weatherford

Western Water: Expanding Uses/Finite Supplies (Summer Conference, June 2-4)

18 pages.


Time, Property Rights, And The Common Law, Thomas W. Merrill Jan 1986

Time, Property Rights, And The Common Law, Thomas W. Merrill

Faculty Scholarship

The fee simple is often defined as an estate or interest of "potentially infinite duration." This way of speaking suggests that property rights are fixed and permanent – indeed, that they last forever. Similarly, property rights are regarded in classical liberal thought as sources of stability and security that foster individual autonomy and protect owners against the vicissitudes of life. This too suggests that property rights are not contingent upon a particular temporal context, but rather are impervious to the passage of time.

When we look at the common law, however, we quickly discover a much more complex relationship between …


Miotke V. City Of Spokane: Nuisance Or Inverse Condemnation—Theories For Government Environmental Liability, Gary L. Baker Jan 1986

Miotke V. City Of Spokane: Nuisance Or Inverse Condemnation—Theories For Government Environmental Liability, Gary L. Baker

Seattle University Law Review

A recent decision by the Washington State Supreme Court, Miotke v. City of Spokane, may broadly affect the right to and type of recovery that will be available to persons whose property rights are infringed either by an agent of the state or by private parties. Miotke involved the dumping of untreated sewage into a river, with the sewage flowing into a lake and interfering with lakefront property owners' enjoyment of their property. The court in Miotke faced a set of claims in property, tort, and state environmental law. The court recognized the significance of its decision and the …


Economics Of Public Use, Thomas W. Merrill Jan 1986

Economics Of Public Use, Thomas W. Merrill

Faculty Scholarship

The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions, provides that private property shall not be taken "for public use" unless just compensation is paid. American courts have long construed this to mean that some showing of "publicness" is a condition precedent to a legitimate exercise of the power of eminent domain. Thus, when a proposed condemnation of property lacks the appropriate public quality, the taking is deemed to be unconstitutional and can be enjoined. In practice, however, most observers today think the public use limitation is a dead letter. Three recent decisions, upholding takings …