Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Future Interests-Rule Against Perpetuities--Validity Of An Option Incident To A Lease Exercisable After The Expiration Of The Lease, Irving Slifkin S.Ed.
Future Interests-Rule Against Perpetuities--Validity Of An Option Incident To A Lease Exercisable After The Expiration Of The Lease, Irving Slifkin S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
On November 13, 1941, plaintiff entered into a lease with defendant granting defendant the exclusive right to mine and remove coal from plaintiff's mine for twenty years. Incident to the lease defendant was granted the option, "at any time subsequent to November 1st, 1945, to purchase the remaining tonnage of recoverable coal" at a specified price. A deed thereto was placed in escrow. In January, 1946, defendant elected to exercise the option, tendered the price, and received the deed from escrow. Plaintiff refused to recognize the validity of the option and commenced an action in equity to cancel the deed …
Quasi-Contracts-Assumpsit For Use And Occupation Of Land, R. O. Hancox S.Ed.
Quasi-Contracts-Assumpsit For Use And Occupation Of Land, R. O. Hancox S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant had a right of way over plaintiff's land limited to the transportation of coal mined on that land. Plaintiff seeks to recover for use and occupation of his land by defendant when he exceeded his right by transporting coal mined on adjacent property. Held, the plaintiff is entitled to quasi-contractual recovery of the value of the benefit to defendant based on the prevailing rate of purchase of right of way for transportation of coal over another's land. Raven Red Ash Coal Co., Inc. v. Ball, (Va. 1946) 39 S.E. (2d) 231.
Eminent Domain-Validity Of State Statute
Eminent Domain-Validity Of State Statute
Michigan Law Review
As upon certiorari, the New Mexico Supreme Court considered the question, whether it is "within legislative competence to declare a public use in the industry of coal mining, so as to permit taking private property in aid of it." Plaintiff had obtained a judgment of condemnation, and defendant attacked it as offensive to the New Mexico constitutional provision: "Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation." The opinion recognized the existence of an "orthodox" and a "liberal" doctrine of construing "public use." While the court found that, unlike Nevada's or Utah's, New Mexico's well-being …