Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Property Law and Real Estate

William & Mary Law School

William & Mary Law Review

Journal

Regulatory Taking

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

An Empirical Study Of Implicit Takings, James E. Krier, Stewart E. Sterk Oct 2016

An Empirical Study Of Implicit Takings, James E. Krier, Stewart E. Sterk

William & Mary Law Review

Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the operation of takings law “on the ground”—in the state and lower federal courts, which together decide the vast bulk of all takings cases. This study, based primarily on an empirical analysis of more than 2000 reported decisions over the period 1979 through 2012, attempts to fill that void.

This study establishes that the Supreme Court’s categorical rules govern almost no state takings cases, and that takings claims based on government regulation almost invariably fail. By contrast, when takings claims arise out of government action other …


Theoretical Tension And Doctrinal Discord: Analyzing Development Impact Fees As Takings, Michael B. Kent Jr. Apr 2010

Theoretical Tension And Doctrinal Discord: Analyzing Development Impact Fees As Takings, Michael B. Kent Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

One of the lingering questions about the law of regulatory takings concerns the proper scope and application of the Supreme Court’s exactions jurisprudence, known as the Nollan/Dolan test. A recurring issue in the case law is the extent to which the Nollan/Dolan framework applies to takings challenges brought against development impact fees. Judicial decisions on the issue split over two primary questions. First, there is a debate about whether Nollan/Dolan is limited to physical exactions or whether the test might also apply to monetary exactions as well. Second, there is a difference of opinion over whether Nollan/Dolan applies only to …


The Demise Of Federal Takings Litigation, Stewart E. Sterk Oct 2006

The Demise Of Federal Takings Litigation, Stewart E. Sterk

William & Mary Law Review

For more than twenty years the Supreme Court has held that a federal takings claim is not ripe until the claimant seeks compensation in state court. The Court's recent opinion in San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City & County of San Francisco establishes that the federal full faith and credit statute applies to federal takings claims. The Court itself recognized that its decision limits the availability of a federal forum for takings claims. In fact, however, claim preclusion doctrine-not considered or discussed by the Court-may result in more stringent limits on federal court review of takings claims than the Court's …


Regulatory Takings And The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause, Matthew P. Harrington Apr 2004

Regulatory Takings And The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause, Matthew P. Harrington

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Politics Of Takings: Choosing The Appropriate Decisionmaker, Lynda L. Butler Mar 1997

The Politics Of Takings: Choosing The Appropriate Decisionmaker, Lynda L. Butler

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The National Flood Insurance Program: Unattained Purposes, Liability In Contract, And Takings, Charles T. Griffith Feb 1994

The National Flood Insurance Program: Unattained Purposes, Liability In Contract, And Takings, Charles T. Griffith

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Property, Federalism, And Jurisprudence: A Comment On Lucas And Judicial Conservativism, Frank I. Michelman Oct 1993

Property, Federalism, And Jurisprudence: A Comment On Lucas And Judicial Conservativism, Frank I. Michelman

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.