Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Property Law and Real Estate

University of Michigan Law School

Journal

1935

Conveyances

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Equity - Rescission Of Contract Induced By Fraud - Money Judgment As An Alternative To Specific Restitution Nov 1935

Equity - Rescission Of Contract Induced By Fraud - Money Judgment As An Alternative To Specific Restitution

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff entered into an agreement for the exchange of interests in real estate with one of the defendants. After payment of part of the boot money agreed upon, the plaintiff defaulted and sued to have the agreement rescinded for fraud. The trial court rendered a money judgment for the amount at which the plaintiff's property had been taken on the trade. Held, that defendant's wife, to whom the property had been conveyed, should have been joined, and that the decree should be modified to order a reconveyance to the plaintiff. Bacon v. Fox, 267 Mich. 589, 255 N. …


Recording - Operation Of The Recording Acts On Quitclaim Deeds May 1935

Recording - Operation Of The Recording Acts On Quitclaim Deeds

Michigan Law Review

A conveyed two specific lots in Harris County to B. Before that deed was recorded, and while the lots were still vacant, A conveyed several specific tracts of land to C and added a blanket clause of "all other lands and interest in lands belonging to A in Harris County"; C made a like conveyance to D; D conveyed the two specific lots in question to E by warranty deed; E conveyed the two lots to plaintiff by warranty deed sixteen years after the deed to C. All the deeds in the second chain of title were …


Vendor And Purchaser - Mortgaging Of Land By Vendor - Effect On Vendee's Duty To Continue Installment Payments Jan 1935

Vendor And Purchaser - Mortgaging Of Land By Vendor - Effect On Vendee's Duty To Continue Installment Payments

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiffs agreed in writing to purchase a tract of land from the defendant, the purchase price to be paid in stated installments or in full at any time at the option of the plaintiffs. Two days after the formation of the contract the defendant mortgaged the land, and about eight months later placed a second mortgage on it. Plaintiffs denied having any knowledge of the mortgages until attempts were made to foreclose them. Previous to this, however, they had defaulted in their payments. In an action in general assumpsit to recover the amount of the installments paid it was held …