Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Condemnation (2)
- Allegany County (1)
- Allegany County Circuit Court (1)
- Aqueduct (1)
- Arbitration (1)
-
- Army Corps of Engineers (1)
- Baltimore Development Corporation (1)
- Benjamin Butler (1)
- City of Washington (1)
- Coal mine (1)
- Conn’s Island (1)
- Cumberland (1)
- Dam (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Economic Development Taking (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Georges Creek Coal and Iron Company (1)
- Great Falls (1)
- Great Falls Manufacturing Company (1)
- History (1)
- Iron Fire Brick and Oil Company (1)
- John Henry Alexander (1)
- John S. Tyson (1)
- Julian Alexander (1)
- Just compensation (1)
- Kelo (1)
- Lincoln Coal (1)
- Lonaconing (1)
- Maryland Court of Appeals (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Defining Power Property Expectations, Michael Pappas
Defining Power Property Expectations, Michael Pappas
Faculty Scholarship
To date, most government efforts to promote distributed solar energy have involved incentivizing property owners to undertake voluntary installations. However, that approach is changing, as government actors move to increase distributed solar generation capacity not only through incentive programs, but also through requirements. Such a change from voluntary to mandatory measures represents a seismic shift in the approach to encouraging distributed solar generation, and it may raise objections about interference with property expectations.
The Comment addresses those concerns by exploring the nature of property expectations in the energy context and analyzing how courts and legislatures have balanced property expectations against …
Reddall V. Bryan And The Role Of State Law In Federal Eminent Domain Jurisprudence, Shannon Frede
Reddall V. Bryan And The Role Of State Law In Federal Eminent Domain Jurisprudence, Shannon Frede
Legal History Publications
Prior to 1875, the standard federal takings procedure had been for state governments to condemn property on behalf of the federal government. As a result, the majority of interpretative work in the early history of eminent domain jurisprudence was undertaken by state courts. In 1853, the Maryland General Assembly granted the United States Government the power to condemn land in Maryland for an aqueduct across the Potomac to supply water to two District cities. In Reddall v. Bryan, the Maryland Court of Appeals upheld the aqueduct supplying the city of Washington with water as a public use. The Court …
Baltimore V. Valsamaki: The Maryland Court Of Appeals' Response To Kelo, Jeff Shaw
Baltimore V. Valsamaki: The Maryland Court Of Appeals' Response To Kelo, Jeff Shaw
Legal History Publications
In the years following the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Kelo v. New London, state judges and legislators across the country responded with a tidal wave of reform to state eminent domain law. While legislative reform efforts largely floundered in the Maryland General Assembly, the Maryland Court of Appeals, in the case of Baltimore v. Valsamaki, curbed the City of Baltimore’s use of quick-take condemnation procedures, imposed additional planning requirements on condemning authorities, and emphasizing the fact that property rights are fundamental constitutional rights. This article will begin with an examination of quick-take procedures and the reasons why …
Public Takings By The State For Private Use: A Maryland Case Study In Georges Creek Coal & Iron Company V. New Central Coal Company (1871-1874), Joshua T. Carback
Public Takings By The State For Private Use: A Maryland Case Study In Georges Creek Coal & Iron Company V. New Central Coal Company (1871-1874), Joshua T. Carback
Legal History Publications
This paper examines the legal controversy concerning New Central Company’s attempt to execute a public taking of the land of the Georges Creek Coal and Iron Company for its private use to build a railroad. This paper analyzes the significance of the case within the social, economic, and political context of the town of Lonaconing in Allegany County, Western Maryland, where the parties were situated. This paper also traces the procedural history of the case, including its appearance before the Allegany Circuit Court in 1872, and before the Maryland Court of Appeals in 1873 and 1874. Finally, this paper presents …
Great Falls Mfg. Co. V. Garland, 124 U.S. 581 (1888): The Final Battle After Thirty Years Of Litigation Over The Rights To Great Falls On The Potomac, Julia Carbonetti
Great Falls Mfg. Co. V. Garland, 124 U.S. 581 (1888): The Final Battle After Thirty Years Of Litigation Over The Rights To Great Falls On The Potomac, Julia Carbonetti
Legal History Publications
The Great Falls Manufacturing Company owned extensive land and water rights at the Great Falls on the Potomac River at the time the United States decided to use the Great Falls as a water supply to the new capital in the City of Washington. In order to use its power of eminent domain, the federal government passed two Acts between 1858 and 1888. During that time, the United States and the Great Falls Manufacturing Company pursued 30 years of litigation to argue the just compensation that was due for the property taken at Great Falls. The 30 years ended in …