Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Property-Personal and Real (2)
- Civil disobedience (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Conscientious objection (1)
- Constitutional property clause (1)
-
- Constitutional property law (1)
- Crime (1)
- Dean Dagan (1)
- Eduardo Peñalver (1)
- Ely (1)
- Genetic research (1)
- Global Debate over Constitutional Property (1)
- Gregory Alexander (1)
- Group rights (1)
- Helmholz (1)
- Laura S. Underkuffler (1)
- Municipal utility districts (1)
- Mythology of property (1)
- Natural property rights (1)
- Property (1)
- Property Outlaws (1)
- Redistribution (1)
- Self-help (1)
- Social-obligated norm (1)
- Social-obligation norms (1)
- Social-responsibility norms (1)
- Sonia Katyal (1)
- Special purpose districts (1)
- Squatting (1)
- Takings Clause (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Human Genetics Studies: The Case For Group Rights, Laura S. Underkuffler
Human Genetics Studies: The Case For Group Rights, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Property As Constitutional Myth: Utilities And Dangers, Laura S. Underkuffler
Property As Constitutional Myth: Utilities And Dangers, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Demythologizing Property And The Illusion Of Rules: A Response To Two Friendly Critics, Gregory S. Alexander
Demythologizing Property And The Illusion Of Rules: A Response To Two Friendly Critics, Gregory S. Alexander
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spend producing written scholarship, most of us have little expectation that more than a tiny handful of people will read our published work, if indeed it is read at all. And probably even fewer of us have any expectation whatsoever that the results of our often wrenching labor will be publicly aired. It is a rare occasion when an academic’s scholarship is the subject of public recognition. But oh, how we crave any sort of public commentary, favorable or critical! So, I am extremely grateful …
Wrestling With Muds To Pin Down The Truth About Special Districts, Sara C. Bronin
Wrestling With Muds To Pin Down The Truth About Special Districts, Sara C. Bronin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Federal, state, and local governments encourage and empower special districts—board-run, special purpose local government units that are administratively and fiscally independent from general purpose local governments. Special districts receive incentives, grants, and freedom from limitations (such as limitations on tax and debt) imposed on general purpose local governments. Special districts are treated favorably because they are small in size, which theoretically means they foster democratic participation; are limited in purpose, meaning that states can tailor the special districts' powers to serve specific problems; and are viewed as efficient solutions to specific problems. Though special districts have tripled in number over …
Property Outlaws, Eduardo M. Peñalver, Sonia K. Katyal
Property Outlaws, Eduardo M. Peñalver, Sonia K. Katyal
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Most people do not hold those who intentionally flout property laws in particularly high regard. The overridingly negative view of the property lawbreaker as a wrong-doer comports with the nearly sacrosanct status of property rights within our characteristically individualist, capitalist, political culture. This dim view of property lawbreakers is also shared to a large degree by property theorists, many of whom regard property rights as a fixed constellation of allocative entitlements that collectively produce stability and order through ownership. In this Article, we seek to rehabilitate, at least to a degree, the maligned character of the intentional property lawbreaker, and …
Three Reasons Why Even Good Property Rights Cause Moral Anxiety, Emily Sherwin
Three Reasons Why Even Good Property Rights Cause Moral Anxiety, Emily Sherwin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Entirely apart from the substantive justification for existing private property rights, there are several reasons why property is, unavoidably, a morally uncomfortable subject.
First, legal property rights are and must be the products of determinate legal rules. As such, they inevitably will diverge in some of their applications from the moral principles that support them.
Second, property rights suffer, more than other legal rights, from problems of transition. Most or all justifications for private property envisage secure rights on which people can and will rely. As a result, there may be genuine moral value in the preservation of rights that …
Commentaries: The Ambiguous Work Of “Natural Property Rights”, Gregory S. Alexander
Commentaries: The Ambiguous Work Of “Natural Property Rights”, Gregory S. Alexander
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The three fascinating papers by Dick Helmholz, Jim Ely, and Mark Tushnet prompt me to ask, why was there so much talk among late 18th and 19th century American lawyers about property as a "natural" right and why has the language persisted today? More specifically, what work is the rhetoric of "natural property rights" intended to do? This is not the proper occasion for developing anything like complete answers to those questions, but I do want to offer three lines of thought that might begin to approach a fuller explanation of the puzzling persistence of natural-property-rights talk.
Lessons From Outlaws, Laura S. Underkuffler
Lessons From Outlaws, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.