Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Al-Kidd (1)
- Article II (1)
- Ashcroft (1)
- Bivens (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
-
- Detainee (1)
- Domestic dissemination ban (1)
- Executive (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Government speech (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- NLRB (1)
- Noel Canning (1)
- Padilla (1)
- Pearson (1)
- Propaganda (1)
- Rasul (1)
- Recess appointments (1)
- Saucier (1)
- Smith–Mundt Act (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Terror (1)
- Textualist orginalism (1)
- War on terror (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Stagnation, And The Global War On Terror, Sarah L. Lochner
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Stagnation, And The Global War On Terror, Sarah L. Lochner
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Definite Article: The D.C. Circuit's Redefinition Of Recess Appointments, Jeff Vandam
The Definite Article: The D.C. Circuit's Redefinition Of Recess Appointments, Jeff Vandam
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Apple Pie Propaganda? The Smith–Mundt Act Before And After The Repeal Of The Domestic Dissemination Ban, Weston R. Sager
Apple Pie Propaganda? The Smith–Mundt Act Before And After The Repeal Of The Domestic Dissemination Ban, Weston R. Sager
Northwestern University Law Review
For over sixty years, the Smith–Mundt Act prohibited the U.S. Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) from disseminating government-produced programming within the United States over fears that these agencies would “propagandize” the American people. However, in 2013, Congress abolished the domestic dissemination ban, which has led to a heated debate about the role of the federal government in free public discourse. Although the 2013 repeal of the domestic dissemination ban promotes greater government transparency and may help counter anti-American sentiment at home, it also gives the federal government great power to covertly influence public opinion. To …