Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Law Institute (1)
- Bluefin tuna (1)
- Case Analysis (1)
- Disparate Impact Discrimination (1)
- Diversity Jurisdiction (1)
-
- Empirical Probability Tables (1)
- Federal Case Load (1)
- Federal Jurisdiction (1)
- Four-Fifths Rule (1)
- ICCAT (1)
- International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (1)
- International law (1)
- Judicial Prediction (1)
- Judicial statistics (1)
- Legal Process (1)
- NOAA fisheries (1)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1)
- Picking up the Slackline (1)
- Precedents (1)
- State Case Load (1)
- Statistical Analyses (1)
- Statistical Significance (1)
- Statistical evidence (Law) (1)
- Successfully regulate commercial fishing (1)
- United States and Japan (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Picking Up The Slackline: Can The United States And Japan Successfully Regulate Commercial Fishing Of Bluefin Tuna Following Failed Intergovernmental Attempts?, Sarah E. Bauer
Indiana Law Journal
Part I of this Note will address the reasons why intergovernmental organizations have failed to adequately regulate the commercial fishing of Bluefin tuna. Part II offers an analysis of the Bluefin markets in the United States and Japan and argues that these countries are ideal candidates for successful Bluefin regulation because of their market structures. Part III explores the likelihood that the two countries would implement such regulations, taking into account the respective governments’ histories of species-specific regulation.
Toward A Coherent Test For Disparate Impact Discrimination, Jennifer L. Peresie
Toward A Coherent Test For Disparate Impact Discrimination, Jennifer L. Peresie
Indiana Law Journal
Statistics are generally plaintiffs' primary evidence in establishing a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination. Thus, the use, or misuse, of statistics dictates case outcomes. Lacking a coherent test for disparate impact, courts choose between the two prevailing tests, statistical significance and the four-fifths rule, in deciding cases, and these tests frequently produce opposite results. Litigants thus face considerable uncertainty and the risk that a judge's preferred outcome will dictate which test is applied. This Article recognizes that the two tests perform complementary functions that both play a useful role in determining whether liability should be imposed. statistical significance …
Judicial Prediction And Analysis From Empirical Probability Tables, Stuart S. Nagel
Judicial Prediction And Analysis From Empirical Probability Tables, Stuart S. Nagel
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Appendix: Statistical Analyses Of Diversity Jurisdiction
Appendix: Statistical Analyses Of Diversity Jurisdiction
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.