Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- John Linarelli (2)
- Academia (1)
- Armed force (1)
- Borrower (1)
- Contractualist (1)
-
- Critical legal studies (1)
- Critical theory (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Feminism (1)
- Gadamer (1)
- Gays and lesbians (1)
- Global economic crisis (1)
- Hermeneutics (1)
- Humanitarian intervention (1)
- Identity (1)
- Justice and Systemic Financial Risk (1)
- Lender (1)
- Luck (1)
- Luck egalitarianism (1)
- Moral justification (1)
- Moral responsibility (1)
- Morality (1)
- Nietzsche (1)
- Racism (1)
- Self governance principle (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- Vattimo (1)
- When Does Might Make Right? Using Force for Regime Change (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Luck, Justice And Systemic Financial Risk, John Linarelli
Luck, Justice And Systemic Financial Risk, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
Systemic financial risk is one of the most significant collective action problems facing societies. The Great Recession brought attention to a tragedy of the commons in capital markets, in which market participants, from first-time homebuyers to Wall Street financiers, acted in ways beneficial to themselves individually, but which together caused substantial collective harm. Two kinds of risk are at play in complex chains of transactions in financial markets: ordinary market risk and systemic risk. Two moral questions are relevant in such cases. First, from the standpoint of interactional morality, does a person have a moral duty to avoid risk of …
When Does Might Make Right? Using Force For Regime Change, John Linarelli
When Does Might Make Right? Using Force For Regime Change, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
Should states use force to bring about regime change? International law recognizes no such grounds. This paper seeks to provide guidance from moral theory. The aim of this paper is to identify the moral grounds for the use of armed force by one state or a group of states, against another state, when the intention of the intervening states is to achieve a fundamental change in the character of the political and legal institutions of the other state. Lawyers tend to place the argument for regime change intervention within putative humanitarian intervention doctrines. The moral justification for humanitarian intervention is …
Nietzschean Critique And Philosophical Hermeneutics, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Nietzschean Critique And Philosophical Hermeneutics, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Scholarly Works
This article appears as part of a Symposium on "Nietzsche and Legal Theory" published by the Cardozo Law Review. It addresses connections between philosophical hermeneutics and Nietzschean critique, and the relevance that these connections might have for legal theory.
Legal practice inevitably is hermeneutical, with lawyers and judges interpreting governing legal texts and the social situations in which they must be applied. Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics describes this practice well, but he treats the question of the possibility of a critical hermeneutics in an ambiguous and under-developed manner. Consequently, Gadamer is frequently (and unfairly) accused of conventionalism and quietism. At …
Reflections On Identity, Diversity And Morality, Deborah W. Post
Reflections On Identity, Diversity And Morality, Deborah W. Post
Scholarly Works
The author reflects over events in her life that helped her define herself and her ethical identity, a black woman teacher.