Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law

PDF

2005

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 57

Full-Text Articles in Law

Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Dec 2005

Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order2005-41

Go to article

Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Dec 2005

Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2005-47

Go to article

Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10

Go to article

Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10

Go to article

Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10

Go to article

Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)

Go to article

Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10

Go to article

Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)

Go to article

Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor Sep 2005

Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor

ExpressO

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission May 2005

Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-100

Go to article

Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-32

Go to article

Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-29

Go to article

Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55

Go to article

Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-38

Go to article

Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55

Go to article

Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2003-37

Go to article

Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-37

Go to article

Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-42

Go to article

Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-49

Go to article

Ethics In The Oil Patch: Who Is The Client And What Difference Does It Make?, John C. Everett Feb 2005

Ethics In The Oil Patch: Who Is The Client And What Difference Does It Make?, John C. Everett

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Technical & Legal Considerations In Implementing An Exploration And Development Plan Or What Do We Do Now?, Robert M. Mcgowen, Robert M. Honea Feb 2005

Technical & Legal Considerations In Implementing An Exploration And Development Plan Or What Do We Do Now?, Robert M. Mcgowen, Robert M. Honea

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Yours, Mine, And Ours: Documenting The Exploration Venture, Mark Boiling Feb 2005

Yours, Mine, And Ours: Documenting The Exploration Venture, Mark Boiling

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Oil & Gas Litigation: What Usually Goes Wrong And What Can Be Done To Prevent It, Ed Norwood Feb 2005

Oil & Gas Litigation: What Usually Goes Wrong And What Can Be Done To Prevent It, Ed Norwood

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Recent Developments In Natural Resoures Law - Circa 2005, Thomas A. Daily Feb 2005

Recent Developments In Natural Resoures Law - Circa 2005, Thomas A. Daily

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Plan To Allow Retrieval Of Alaskan Oil Could Upend Decades Of Precedent, Shauna Coleman Jan 2005

Plan To Allow Retrieval Of Alaskan Oil Could Upend Decades Of Precedent, Shauna Coleman

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance In Extractive Industries, Matthew Nick Jan 2005

Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance In Extractive Industries, Matthew Nick

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The oil and natural gas reserves under the Caspian Sea have sparked the interest of international investors and oil firms. The political, economic, and social turmoil in the five countries bordering the Caspian Sea, however, pose significant challenges for effective regulation of multinational interaction with the five Caspian states. A joint-effort approach to regulation involving the World Bank, multinational enterprises, and the individual Caspian states' governments poses the most functional and efficient means of instituting international oversight. Such a tripartite structure connects the fortunes of all the parties and provides safeguards against default by any single entity. A mutually beneficial …

Go to article

Sand Wars: Mineral Reservation Policies Lead The Supreme Court To Determine Whether Sand Is A Valuable Mineral In The Nevada Desert, James L. Ryan Jan 2005

Sand Wars: Mineral Reservation Policies Lead The Supreme Court To Determine Whether Sand Is A Valuable Mineral In The Nevada Desert, James L. Ryan

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Who Owns Coalbed Methane In West Virginia, S. Ryan White Jan 2005

Who Owns Coalbed Methane In West Virginia, S. Ryan White

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Good Cause In The Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure., Naomi Mccuistion Jan 2005

Good Cause In The Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure., Naomi Mccuistion

St. Mary's Law Journal

The Texas judiciary should give “good cause” a single meaning. Ambiguity exists concerning the phrase “good cause” amongst Texas courts. Three different standards of “good cause” currently exist in Texas including: the Stelly/Craddock standard, the Alvarado standard, and the Remington Arms standard. Under the Stelly/Craddock standard—if withdrawal of deemed admissions is requested—“good cause” is required showing the failure was unintentional as a result of an accident or mistake. Under the Alvarado standard—if the request is to offer testimony of a witness who was not timely identified—the court requires a more strict showing of “good cause” not satisfied by an attorney’s …

Go to article

The Effect Of A Harmless Error In Executing A Will: Why Texas Should Adopt Section 2-503 Of The Uniform Probate Court., Sean P. Milligan Jan 2005

The Effect Of A Harmless Error In Executing A Will: Why Texas Should Adopt Section 2-503 Of The Uniform Probate Court., Sean P. Milligan

St. Mary's Law Journal

Often, the validity of a will is called into question in situations where the testator failed to execute the will in compliance with statutory formalities, although the intent to create a will was present. In Texas, harmless errors in the execution of a will are not excused, and the testator must comply with the statutory formalities set out in the Probate Code. Strict judicial adherence to statutory formalities leads to unjust results in situations where it is relatively clear that the testator intended to create a will but failed to comply with the execution requirements. The failure to comply with …

Go to article

Next Last