Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Brain (2)
- Neuroscience (2)
- Adolescent (1)
- Agenesis (1)
- Alleviating social deprivation (1)
-
- Behavioral science (1)
- Brain imaging (1)
- Brain scans (1)
- Causation (1)
- Children (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Cognitive neuroscience (1)
- Cognitive psychology (1)
- Crime (1)
- Culpability (1)
- Developmental delay (1)
- FMRI (1)
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- Juvenile justice (1)
- Law and neuroscience (1)
- Law and neuroscience; criminal law; mental state; mens rea; Penal Code; brain imaging; neuroimaging; neuroscience; neurolaw (1)
- Maturity (1)
- Mens rea (1)
- Minors (1)
- Neuroimaging (1)
- Neurolaw (1)
- Neurosciences (1)
- Neuroscientists (1)
- Policies to aid the disadvantaged (1)
- Poverty (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Confabulation In Individuals With Disorders Of The Corpus Callosum: Educational Implications, Cheryl Lynn Wright
Confabulation In Individuals With Disorders Of The Corpus Callosum: Educational Implications, Cheryl Lynn Wright
Dissertations
Individuals with disorders of the corpus callosum (DCC) may have subtle cognitive differences. Historically, confabulation has been associated with DCC. Therapies to mitigate confabulation is a newly emerging field. This study explores the possible educational implications that those with DCC may experience with confabulation.
The community of people with DCC and the community of people who interact with individuals with DCC were surveyed to ascertain the prevalence of confabulation within the population of those with DCC. A subset of questions probed whether age and/or gender impact the rates of reported confabulation. The research paradigm included a section that covered the …
Neuroscience Changes More Than You Can Think, Paul S. Davies, Peter A. Alces
Neuroscience Changes More Than You Can Think, Paul S. Davies, Peter A. Alces
Faculty Publications
In this Essay, we consider the contribution of a startling new book, Law & Neuroscience (L&N), by Owen Jones, Jeffrey Schall, and Francis Shen. It is a law school course book (a genre not often the focus of a scholarly review essay) that supports fundamental inquiry into the relationship between emerging neuroscientific insights and doctrinal conceptions in the law. We believe that the book shifts the paradigm and so may profoundly affect the course of normative evaluation of law. In this Essay, we trace and evaluate the “argument” of the book and suggest ways in which its contribution to the …
Predicting The Knowledge: Recklessness Distinction In The Human Brain, Owen D. Jones, Iris Vilares, Michael J. Wesley, Woo-Young Ahn, Et Al.
Predicting The Knowledge: Recklessness Distinction In The Human Brain, Owen D. Jones, Iris Vilares, Michael J. Wesley, Woo-Young Ahn, Et Al.
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Criminal convictions require proof that a prohibited act was performed in a statutorily specified mental state. Different legal consequences, including greater punishments, are mandated for those who act in a state of knowledge, compared with a state of recklessness. Existing research, however, suggests people have trouble classifying defendants as knowing, rather than reckless, even when instructed on the relevant legal criteria.
We used a machine-learning technique on brain imaging data to predict, with high accuracy, which mental state our participants were in. This predictive ability depended on both the magnitude of the risks and the amount of information about those …
How Should Justice Policy Treat Young Offenders?, B J. Casey, Richard J. Bonnie, Andre Davis, David L. Faigman, Morris B. Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Read Montague, Stephen J. Morse, Marcus E. Raichle, Jennifer A. Richeson, Elizabeth S. Scott, Laurence Steinberg, Kim A. Taylor-Thompson, Anthony D. Wagner
How Should Justice Policy Treat Young Offenders?, B J. Casey, Richard J. Bonnie, Andre Davis, David L. Faigman, Morris B. Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Read Montague, Stephen J. Morse, Marcus E. Raichle, Jennifer A. Richeson, Elizabeth S. Scott, Laurence Steinberg, Kim A. Taylor-Thompson, Anthony D. Wagner
All Faculty Scholarship
The justice system in the United States has long recognized that juvenile offenders are not the same as adults, and has tried to incorporate those differences into law and policy. But only in recent decades have behavioral scientists and neuroscientists, along with policymakers, looked rigorously at developmental differences, seeking answers to two overarching questions: Are young offenders, purely by virtue of their immaturity, different from older individuals who commit crimes? And, if they are, how should justice policy take this into account?
A growing body of research on adolescent development now confirms that teenagers are indeed inherently different from adults, …
The Poverty Of The Neuroscience Of Poverty: Policy Payoff Or False Promise?, Amy L. Wax
The Poverty Of The Neuroscience Of Poverty: Policy Payoff Or False Promise?, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
A recent body of work in neuroscience examines the brains of people suffering from social and economic disadvantage. This article assesses claims that this research can help generate more effective strategies for addressing these social conditions and their effects. It concludes that the so-called neuroscience of deprivation has no unique practical payoff, and that scientists, journalists, and policy-makers should stop claiming otherwise. Because this research does not, and generally cannot, distinguish between innate versus environmental causes of brain characteristics, it cannot predict whether neurological and behavioral deficits can be addressed by reducing social deprivation. Also, knowledge of brain mechanisms yields …