Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0839: Municipality Of Sebring, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Ohio Valley Energy Systems, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0839: Municipality Of Sebring, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Ohio Valley Energy Systems, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2011-37; (Ohio Valley Energy Systems, Grindley #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0842: Lee & Angela Vickers V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0842: Lee & Angela Vickers V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
abandonment questions
Appeal No. 0836: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0836: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2011-21 (Frick #2 & #6, Menzie #1, Carrel #2 Unit)
Appeal No. 0835: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Beck Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0835: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Beck Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2011-18; (Beck Energy, Inc.; Bechter #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0838: Summitcrest, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0838: Summitcrest, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Permit Issuance; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC
Wetlands, Property Rights, And The Due Process Deficit In Environmental Law, Jonathan H. Adler
Wetlands, Property Rights, And The Due Process Deficit In Environmental Law, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
In Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency a unanimous Supreme Court held that private landowners could seek judicial review of an Administrative Compliance Order issued by the Environmental Protection Agency alleging that their land contained wetlands subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. The Court’s decision rested on statutory grounds, but the same result may have been dictated by principles of due process. Under the CWA, federal regulators have asserted authority over waters and dry lands alike and sought to expand federal jurisdiction well beyond constitutional limits. Under existing regulations, landowners have little notice or certainty as to whose lands …