Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Child abuse (3)
- A. Publications in Peer-reviewed Journals (2)
- Addiction (2)
- Child development (2)
- Child neglect (2)
-
- Child psychology (2)
- Child witnesses (2)
- Decision Making (2)
- Forensic Evidence (2)
- Judges (2)
- Mental Health Evidence (2)
- Mental Health Experts (2)
- Adoption law (1)
- Alcoholism (1)
- Assessment (1)
- B. Publications in Books (1)
- Best interest of the child (1)
- Case study (1)
- Child witness (1)
- Compensation barriers (1)
- Competency to stand trial (1)
- Comprehensive treatment (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- Criminalization (1)
- Cst (1)
- Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (1)
- Drug courts (1)
- Drug dependence (1)
- Drug policy (1)
- Food and drug administration (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
22. Young Children’S Emerging Ability To Make False Statements., Thomas D. Lyon, Elizabeth C. Ahern, Jodi A. Quas
22. Young Children’S Emerging Ability To Make False Statements., Thomas D. Lyon, Elizabeth C. Ahern, Jodi A. Quas
Thomas D. Lyon
14. Investigative Interviewing Of The Child., Thomas D. Lyon
14. Investigative Interviewing Of The Child., Thomas D. Lyon
Thomas D. Lyon
21. Children’S Reasoning About Disclosing Adult Transgressions: Effects Of Maltreatment, Child Age, And Adult Identity., Thomas D. Lyon, Elizabeth C. Ahern, Lindsay A. Malloy, Jodi A. Quas
21. Children’S Reasoning About Disclosing Adult Transgressions: Effects Of Maltreatment, Child Age, And Adult Identity., Thomas D. Lyon, Elizabeth C. Ahern, Lindsay A. Malloy, Jodi A. Quas
Thomas D. Lyon
Introduction: Obstacles To The Development And Use Of Pharmacotherapies For Addiction, Richard C. Boldt
Introduction: Obstacles To The Development And Use Of Pharmacotherapies For Addiction, Richard C. Boldt
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
The Virtues Of Pragmatism In Drug Policy, Richard J. Bonnie
The Virtues Of Pragmatism In Drug Policy, Richard J. Bonnie
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Harm Reduction And The American Difference: Drug Treatment And Problem-Solving Courts In Comparative Perspective, James L. Noland Jr.
Harm Reduction And The American Difference: Drug Treatment And Problem-Solving Courts In Comparative Perspective, James L. Noland Jr.
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Failure Of Physicians To Prescribe Pharmacotherapies For Addiction: Regulatory Restrictions And Physician Resistance, Ellen M. Weber
Failure Of Physicians To Prescribe Pharmacotherapies For Addiction: Regulatory Restrictions And Physician Resistance, Ellen M. Weber
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
The Food And Drug Administration And The Pharmacy Profession: Partners To Ensure The Safety And Efficacy Of Pharmacogenomic Therapy, Jennifer E. Spreng
The Food And Drug Administration And The Pharmacy Profession: Partners To Ensure The Safety And Efficacy Of Pharmacogenomic Therapy, Jennifer E. Spreng
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Special Issues In Transcultural, Transracial, And Gay And Lesbian Parenting And Adoption, Frank E. Vandervort, Robert B. Sanoshy
Special Issues In Transcultural, Transracial, And Gay And Lesbian Parenting And Adoption, Frank E. Vandervort, Robert B. Sanoshy
Book Chapters
The adoption of children whose natural parents are unable to or incapable of caring for them by adults who are able to provide for them has existed throughout human history in one form or another (In re Smith Estate 1955; Miller et al. 2007). Before the mid-1800s, however, there was no formal mechanism for a person interested in adopting a child in the United States to do so (Bartholet 1999). In 1851, the Massachusetts legislature enacted the Massachusetts Adoption of Children Act (General Court of Massachusetts 1851). Though enacted more than 150 years ago, the act's basic structure is clearly …
Mental Disorders And The "System Of Judgmental Responsibility", Anita L. Allen
Mental Disorders And The "System Of Judgmental Responsibility", Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rational Understanding In Competency To Stand Trial: A Qualitative Study And Development Of An Assessment Instrument, Kenneth C. Cole Jr.
Rational Understanding In Competency To Stand Trial: A Qualitative Study And Development Of An Assessment Instrument, Kenneth C. Cole Jr.
Antioch University Dissertations & Theses
Mental competency as a prerequisite for due process was established by the United States Supreme Court‟s Dusky decision (1960). The Court mandated that a defendant must possess reasonable levels of factual and rational understanding in order to competently participate in the adjudication process. The precise definitions of competence were not included in any of the Court‟s decisions regarding the concept of Competency to Stand Trial (CST). The original purpose of this research was to contribute knowledge regarding the psychological dimensions of CST and to suggest definitions of the psychological dimensions of CST and the standardization of the CST evaluation process. …
Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence, Richard E. Redding, Daniel C. Murrie
Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence, Richard E. Redding, Daniel C. Murrie
Richard E. Redding
Judges play a central role in decision making in the justice system. This chapter reviews the extant empirical research on judicial decision making in criminal, juvenile, and civil cases. We discuss judges’ decision making about forensic mental health evidence introduced in these cases, judicial receptivity to various kinds of evidence, and their understanding of clinical and scientific evidence as well as the ways they make rulings about such evidence. We focus on decision making at the trial court level, in those arenas that are most relevant to the forensic mental health practitioner (psychiatrist, psychologist, or social worker) who is called …
Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence, Richard E. Redding, Daniel C. Murrie
Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence, Richard E. Redding, Daniel C. Murrie
Richard E. Redding
Judges play a central role in decision making in the justice system. This chapter reviews the extant empirical research on judicial decision making in criminal, juvenile, and civil cases. We discuss judges’ decision making about forensic mental health evidence introduced in these cases, judicial receptivity to various kinds of evidence, and their understanding of clinical and scientific evidence as well as the ways they make rulings about such evidence. We focus on decision making at the trial court level, in those arenas that are most relevant to the forensic mental health practitioner (psychiatrist, psychologist, or social worker) who is called …