Law Commons^™

The Litigation Finance Contract, Maya Steinitz

Faculty Scholarship

Litigation funding-for-profit, nonrecourse funding of a litigation by a nonparty-is a new and rapidly developing industry. It has been described as one of the "biggest and most influential trends in civil justice" today by RAND, the New York Times, and others. Despite the importance and growth of the industry, there is a complete absence of information about or discussion of litigation finance contracting, even though all the promises and pitfalls of litigation funding stem from the relationships those contracts establish and organize. Further, the literature and case law pertaining to litigation funding have evolved from an analogy between litigation funding …

Principio De Solidaridad, Acciones Populares Y Derechos Colectivos En Colombia: Aproximaciones Críticas A La Sentencia C-630 Del 2011 De La Corte Constitucional, Daniel Monroy

Daniel A Monroy C

ABSTRACT

This article presents a serious rapprochement to the arguments that the Constitutional Court put forward in the judgment C- 630 of 2011. The main objective of this article is to prove the weakness of the arguments, especially on those that are supported in the constitution´s principle of solidarity and those that derive in “duties’s consideration. This article beginning with some critiques to the class actions rights and it protection´s mechanism, bases in economic analysis. Afterward, base in the general description that the court have establish in the principle of solidarity, this article explain the different way how the court …

The Relational Contingency Of Rights, Alex Stein, Gideon Parchomovsky

Alex Stein

In this Article, we demonstrate, contrary to conventional wisdom, that all rights are relationally contingent. Our main thesis is that rights afford their holders meaningful protection only against challengers who face higher litigation costs than the rightholder. Contrariwise, challengers who can litigate more cheaply than a rightholder can force the rightholder to forfeit the right and thereby render the right ineffective. Consequently, in the real world, rights avail only against certain challengers but not others. This result is robust and pervasive. Furthermore, it obtains irrespectively of how rights and other legal entitlements are defined by the legislator or construed by …