Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alternate juror rules (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Convergence (1)
-
- Education (1)
- Education finance (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fundamental conceptions (1)
- Hohfeld (1)
- Individual rights (1)
- Kentucky (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Pro se litigation (1)
- Rights (1)
- School (1)
- School finance (1)
- Self-representation (1)
- State (1)
- State constitutional rights (1)
- State constitutions (1)
- Trial bifurcation (1)
- Unrepresented litigants (1)
- Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Non-Prisoner Pro Se Litigation In The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Kentucky: Analyzing 2004 And 2007 Cases From Filing To Termination, Timothy D. Thompson
Non-Prisoner Pro Se Litigation In The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Kentucky: Analyzing 2004 And 2007 Cases From Filing To Termination, Timothy D. Thompson
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
An Unnecessary Conflict: Bifurcated Civil Trials And States' Need For An Alternate Rule For Alternate Jurors, Craig M. Brunson
An Unnecessary Conflict: Bifurcated Civil Trials And States' Need For An Alternate Rule For Alternate Jurors, Craig M. Brunson
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
State Constitutions And Individual Rights: Conceptual Convergence In School Finance Litigation, Scott R. Bauries
State Constitutions And Individual Rights: Conceptual Convergence In School Finance Litigation, Scott R. Bauries
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article begins by reviewing Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld's “fundamental conceptions” and expanding his theory to the arena of state constitutional rights, building on recent work by other scholars. From this foundation, it moves to a discussion of the sources of rights to education. The Article then examines the text of relevant state constitutional provisions, as well as the ever-changing landscape of school finance litigation, the principal vehicle through which litigants assert constitutional claims based on ostensible education rights. Next, it systematically analyzes the population of reported cases from the highest state courts to identify Hohfeldian conceptions of education rights held …