Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 50 percent hypothesis (1)
- Benjamin Klein (1)
- Business liability (1)
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group (1)
- Corporate responsibility (1)
-
- Corporate wrongdoing (1)
- Deep pockets effect (1)
- Defective product designs (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Failure-to-warn (1)
- George Priest (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Plaintiff success rates (1)
- Public attitudes toward business (1)
- Selection effect (1)
- Selection of disputes for trial (1)
- Strict liability (1)
- Twilight Zone--The Movie (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Testing The Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework With Empirical Tests, Theodore Eisenberg
Testing The Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework With Empirical Tests, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Recent law and economics scholarship has produced much theoretical and empirical work on how and why legal disputes are settled and litigated. One of the most significant developments in this literature, attributable to the work of William Baxter and the combined efforts of George Priest and Benjamin Klein, has been the formation of a theory about both the selection of disputes for trial and the rates of success that plaintiffs enjoy for those cases that are resolved at trial. The basic theory contains two components. The selection effect refers to the proposition that the selection of tried cases is not …
Doctrinal Collapse In Products Liability: The Empty Shell Of Failure To Warn, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Doctrinal Collapse In Products Liability: The Empty Shell Of Failure To Warn, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Liability for a manufacturer's failure to warn of product-related risks is a well-established feature of modern products liability law. Yet many serious doctrinal and conceptual problems underlie these claims. Professors Henderson and Twerski explore these problems and argue that failure-to-warn jurisprudence is confused, perhaps irreparably, and that this confusion often results in the imposition of excessive liability on manufacturers. The authors begin by exposing basic errors resulting from courts' confusion over whether to apply a strict liability or a negligence standard of care in failure-to-warn cases. Having determined that negligence is the appropriate standard, they then examine more substantial and …
Attitudes Toward Corporate Responsibility: A Psycholegal Perspective, Valerie P. Hans
Attitudes Toward Corporate Responsibility: A Psycholegal Perspective, Valerie P. Hans
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
One of the most striking phenomena in the contemporary legal world is the shift toward holding businesses and corporations responsible for harm. Legal theorists and historians maintain that today business corporations are expected to provide compensation for injuries that in earlier times would have been attributed to individuals or to fate. Furthermore, criminal charges against businesses and business executives are becoming commonplace.
Despite a good deal of legal scholarship on the shift toward holding businesses culpable for harms, psychologists have conducted little systematic research on public views of corporate responsibility. How do people conceptualize the civil liability or criminal responsibility …