Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
-
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Pace University (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (9)
- Civil rights (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Hearsay (4)
- Nevada (4)
-
- West (4)
- California (3)
- California Courts of Appeal (3)
- Courts (3)
- Practice and Procedure (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Utah (3)
- Water transfers (3)
- Wyoming (3)
- Adjudication (2)
- Agreements (2)
- Arizona v. California (2)
- Beneficial use (2)
- Bureau of Reclamation (2)
- Business justification (2)
- Central Arizona Project (2)
- Changing demands (2)
- Choice of law (2)
- Civil rights litigation (2)
- Color (2)
- Conservation (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Disparate impact (2)
- Electric Consumers Protection Act (2)
- Endangered Species Act (2)
- Publication
-
- Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
-
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Candace Kovacic-Fleischer (1)
- Continuing Legal Education Materials (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 63
Full-Text Articles in Law
Trial Practice And Procedure, David A. Forehand Jr., Ken M. Nimmons
Trial Practice And Procedure, David A. Forehand Jr., Ken M. Nimmons
Mercer Law Review
Because the trial of a lawsuit is often, by its very nature, as dramatic as a Shakespearean production, the trial lawyer must assume the roles of writer, actor, and director. He must indulge himself in the effusions of forensic eloquence, "reason with the accuracy and power of the trained logician, and enforce his cause with all the inspirations of genius," and ultimately persuade a jury to his cause. In attempting to set the stage for a successful conclusion to the drama of trial, the trial lawyer must adhere to the rules of trial practice and procedure. While the authors of …
Litigation, C. Oshiro
The Use Of Risk Assessment Evidence To Prove Increased Risk And Alternative Causation In Toxic Tort Litigation, Michael S. Baram
The Use Of Risk Assessment Evidence To Prove Increased Risk And Alternative Causation In Toxic Tort Litigation, Michael S. Baram
Faculty Scholarship
Due to the difficulties of proving causation in most toxic tort suits, plaintiffs and defendants in toxic tort litigation have begun to develop and use scientifically sophisticated risk assessments as evidence in proving or disproving causation. This use has led to two new trends in tort liability. First, there is the trend in which risk assessment is used by plaintiffs to buttress claims for future injury or increased risk. Second, there is the trend in which risk assessment is used by defendants to establish that other factors caused, in whole or in part, plaintiffs’ injuries.
This article evaluates these two …
Fairness To The Absent Members Of A Defendant Class: A Proposed Revision Of Rule 23, Elizabeth Barker Brandt
Fairness To The Absent Members Of A Defendant Class: A Proposed Revision Of Rule 23, Elizabeth Barker Brandt
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Litigation, C. Oshiro
Legal Devices For Enhancing Water Diversion Opportunities Within The Appropriation System, David C. Hallford
Legal Devices For Enhancing Water Diversion Opportunities Within The Appropriation System, David C. Hallford
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
28 pages.
Evaluating Judicial Capacity To Determine Public Welfare Values In Water Transfers, Charles T. Dumars
Evaluating Judicial Capacity To Determine Public Welfare Values In Water Transfers, Charles T. Dumars
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
31 pages (includes illustrations).
Contains references.
Water Agencies And Water Transfers In California: A Case Study Of The Kern County Water Agency, Brian E. Gray
Water Agencies And Water Transfers In California: A Case Study Of The Kern County Water Agency, Brian E. Gray
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
20 pages.
Contains references.
The Role Of Market Transfers In The Accommodation Of New Uses: A Case Study Of The Truckee-Carson Basin, A. Dan Tarlock
The Role Of Market Transfers In The Accommodation Of New Uses: A Case Study Of The Truckee-Carson Basin, A. Dan Tarlock
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
31 pages (includes 1 map).
The Role Of The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission In Protecting Non-Consumptive Water Uses, Peter J. Kirsch, J. Barton Seitz
The Role Of The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission In Protecting Non-Consumptive Water Uses, Peter J. Kirsch, J. Barton Seitz
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
55 pages.
Update On Market Strategies For The Protection Of Western Instream Flows And Wetlands, Robert Wigington
Update On Market Strategies For The Protection Of Western Instream Flows And Wetlands, Robert Wigington
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
49 pages.
Contains references.
Sources Of Water Iv: Tribal Water Rights, John E. Echohawk
Sources Of Water Iv: Tribal Water Rights, John E. Echohawk
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
10 pages.
Contains references.
Sources Of Water Iii: Interstate Transfers, Clyde O. Martz
Sources Of Water Iii: Interstate Transfers, Clyde O. Martz
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
35 pages.
Contains references.
Shifting The Uses Of Water In The West: An Overview, Lawrence J. Macdonnell
Shifting The Uses Of Water In The West: An Overview, Lawrence J. Macdonnell
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
31 pages.
Contains references.
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado Law School professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Mark Squillace.
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers will be the theme for this year's water conference, June 6-8 at the Law School in Boulder. The conference will consider the changing demands for water in the West and the need to reallocate a portion of the existing uses of water to new uses.
The first day will provide the background by looking at the most likely sources of water to meet these demands, including agriculture, federal water projects, interstate transfers, and …
Testing The Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework With Empirical Tests, Theodore Eisenberg
Testing The Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework With Empirical Tests, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Recent law and economics scholarship has produced much theoretical and empirical work on how and why legal disputes are settled and litigated. One of the most significant developments in this literature, attributable to the work of William Baxter and the combined efforts of George Priest and Benjamin Klein, has been the formation of a theory about both the selection of disputes for trial and the rates of success that plaintiffs enjoy for those cases that are resolved at trial. The basic theory contains two components. The selection effect refers to the proposition that the selection of tried cases is not …
Doctrinal Collapse In Products Liability: The Empty Shell Of Failure To Warn, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Doctrinal Collapse In Products Liability: The Empty Shell Of Failure To Warn, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Liability for a manufacturer's failure to warn of product-related risks is a well-established feature of modern products liability law. Yet many serious doctrinal and conceptual problems underlie these claims. Professors Henderson and Twerski explore these problems and argue that failure-to-warn jurisprudence is confused, perhaps irreparably, and that this confusion often results in the imposition of excessive liability on manufacturers. The authors begin by exposing basic errors resulting from courts' confusion over whether to apply a strict liability or a negligence standard of care in failure-to-warn cases. Having determined that negligence is the appropriate standard, they then examine more substantial and …
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Judicial Discretion: Is One More Of A Good Thing Too Much?, David B. Sentelle
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Judicial Discretion by Aharon Barak
Reform And Regret: The Story Of Federal Judicial Involvement In The Alabama Prison System, Steven M. Farina
Reform And Regret: The Story Of Federal Judicial Involvement In The Alabama Prison System, Steven M. Farina
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Reform and Regret: The Story of Federal Judicial Involvement in the Alabama Prison System by Larry W. Yackle
Invasion Of Privacy: The Cross Creek Trial Of Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings, Laura J. Hines
Invasion Of Privacy: The Cross Creek Trial Of Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings, Laura J. Hines
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Invasion of Privacy: The Cross Creek Trial of Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings by Patricia Nassif Acton
Strandell V. Jackson County And G. Heileman Brewing Co. V. Joseph Oat Corp.: The Failure Of The Seventh Circuit Court Of Appeals To Narrow The Interpretation Of Rule 16 And Limit The Inherent Power Doctrine, Farol Parco
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Litigation, J. D'Angelo
Dispute Processing And A Longitudinal Approach To Trial Courts, Lynn Mather
Dispute Processing And A Longitudinal Approach To Trial Courts, Lynn Mather
Journal Articles
This article suggests ways to integrate the insights and findings of two rather distinct fields: docket-based, longitudinal studies of trial courts and studies of dispute processing. In particular, I argue that longitudinal research on courts would benefit enormously from the incorporation of concepts and data on dispute processing. For example, instead of taking court cases as the starting point for study, longitudinal research should explore the multistage and transformative nature of disputing. Historical data should also be collected on the nature of the relationships between opposing litigants, on the roles played by participants other than the litigants (lawyers, supporters, audiences, …
Reassessing Rule 11 And Civil Rights Cases, Carl W. Tobias
Reassessing Rule 11 And Civil Rights Cases, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
The Advisory Committee on the Civil Rules amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule 11) in August 1983 because of increasing concern about attorney abuses in civil lawsuits and about the so-called litigation explosion. The revision commands courts to sanction lawyers and parties who do not undertake reasonable prefiling inquiries. Certain aspects of the new version's implementation provoked substantial controversy which continued virtually undiminished from the amendment's August 1983 effective date at least until the fifth anniversary of its adoption. Perhaps most controversial was the question whether courts' application inhibited the pursuit of legitimate litigation, especially cases involving civil rights …
Hearsay: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli
Hearsay: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
The Revolution In Preliminary Injunctions Against Patent Infringement, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 225 (1990), Thomas L. Creel, Donna M. Praiss
The Revolution In Preliminary Injunctions Against Patent Infringement, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 225 (1990), Thomas L. Creel, Donna M. Praiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Our Nation's Energy And Resources - Decision Making In Conflict, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1990), Wallace H. Johnson
Our Nation's Energy And Resources - Decision Making In Conflict, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1990), Wallace H. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Brief Argument For Greater Control Of Litigation Discretion - The Public Interest And Public Choice Contexts, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1990), Walter J. Kendall Iii
A Brief Argument For Greater Control Of Litigation Discretion - The Public Interest And Public Choice Contexts, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1990), Walter J. Kendall Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers Take Heed! A De Novo Review Of Rule 11 In North Carolina - Turner V. Duke Univ., T. June Hobby
Lawyers Take Heed! A De Novo Review Of Rule 11 In North Carolina - Turner V. Duke Univ., T. June Hobby
Campbell Law Review
This Note will propose the standard of review which best balances both concerns. First, this Note will summarize the facts of Turner, to introduce the setting of the Rule 11 decision. Second, in the Background section, this Note will explore the history of Rule 11 in the federal courts and in North Carolina, and the various standards of review adopted in the federal courts. Third, this Note will analyze the Turner decision and the standard of appellate review adopted by the North Carolina Supreme Court. Fourth, this Note will compare the standards of review and suggest which of the …