Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Apple (1)
- Asylums (1)
- Community services (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
-
- Copyright law (1)
- Deinstitutionalization (1)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1)
- Disabilities (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Due process (1)
- File sharing (1)
- Google (1)
- Grokster (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Internet (1)
- Mental health (1)
- Music industry (1)
- Napster (1)
- Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring (1)
- Psychiatric facilities (1)
- Recording industry (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Past And Future Of Deinstitutionalization Litigation, Samuel R. Bagenstos
The Past And Future Of Deinstitutionalization Litigation, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Articles
Two conflicting stories have consumed the academic debate regarding the impact of deinstitutionalization litigation. The first, which has risen almost to the level of conventional wisdom, is that deinstitutionalization was a disaster. The second story challenges the suggestion that deinstitutionalization has uniformly been unsuccessful, as well as the causal link critics seek to draw with the growth of the homeless population. This Article, which embraces the second story, assesses the current wave of deinstitutionalization litigation. It contends that things will be different this time. The particular outcomes of the first wave of deinstitutionalization litigation, this Article contends, resulted from the …
Antibiotic Resistance, Jessica D. Litman
Antibiotic Resistance, Jessica D. Litman
Articles
Ten years ago, when I wrote War Stories,' copyright lawyers were fighting over the question whether unlicensed personal, noncommercial copying, performance or display would be deemed copyright infringement. I described three strategies that lawyers for book publishers, record labels, and movie studios had deployed to try to assure that the question was answered the way they wanted it to be. First, copyright owners were labeling all unlicensed uses as "piracy" on the ground that any unlicensed use might undermine copyright owners' control. That epithet helped to obscure the difference between unlicensed uses that invaded defined statutory exclusive rights and other …