Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Act (5)
- ACA (3)
- Affordable (3)
- Care (3)
- Legislation (3)
-
- Supreme Court (3)
- Virginia (3)
- Challenge (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Expansion (2)
- Federal (2)
- Limitation (2)
- Patient (2)
- Protection (2)
- Severability (2)
- ADA (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Absentee (1)
- Academia (1)
- Administration (1)
- Admission (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Age (1)
- Agency (1)
- Amendment (1)
- American (1)
- Arbitrary (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- As-applied (1)
- Assembly (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
2010-2011 Veterans Law Update, Kathleen Dwyer, Alec Kast, Scott A. Sigmon, Andrew E. Tarne
2010-2011 Veterans Law Update, Kathleen Dwyer, Alec Kast, Scott A. Sigmon, Andrew E. Tarne
Law Student Publications
Part I will cover updates related directly to veterans' benefits and rights. Part II will focus on updates to rules involving veterans' caregivers and healthcare facilities. Part III will cover proposed rules dealing with veterans' claims and insurance. Part IV will focus on rules and case law covering the VA's procedures and operating regulations.
Administrative Law, John Paul Jones, Afsana Chowdhury
Administrative Law, John Paul Jones, Afsana Chowdhury
University of Richmond Law Review
What follows is, first, a report of certain developments during the last two years in the administrative law of Virginia, in particular the law governing rule making by state agencies and judicial review of both rules and cases from state agencies and, second, a report of developments in the law relating to Virginia's Freedom of Information Act.
Election Law, Christopher R. Nolen, Jeff Palmore
Election Law, Christopher R. Nolen, Jeff Palmore
University of Richmond Law Review
Other than a few controversial measures, the 2012 Virginia General Assembly made modest changes to Virginia's laws re-garding the administration and conduct of elections. Most activity in this arena concerned issues that had significant federal election implications: specifically, the adoption of changes to strengthen Virginia's existing voter identification law and the enactment of a congressional redistricting plan. This article surveys developments in Virginia election law for the latter part of 2011and the 2012 General Assembly session. The focus is on those statutory developments that have significance or general applicability to the implementation of Virginia's election laws. Consequently, not every election-related …
Labor And Employment Law, Vijay K. Mago, Elizabeth E. Clarke, Eric Wallace
Labor And Employment Law, Vijay K. Mago, Elizabeth E. Clarke, Eric Wallace
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Land Use And Zoning Law, Philip Carter Strother, Andrew E. Tarne
Land Use And Zoning Law, Philip Carter Strother, Andrew E. Tarne
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who's The Author? A Bright-Line Rule For Specially Commissioned Works Made For Hire, Richard D. Palmieri
Who's The Author? A Bright-Line Rule For Specially Commissioned Works Made For Hire, Richard D. Palmieri
Law Student Publications
This comment argues that the best way to clarify the answer to the question "Who's the author?" (and thus to clarify whether the creator has a termination right) is to resolve the circuit split in favor of a bright-line rule requiring execution of the written agreement prior to the creation of the work. Part I introduces the legal framework under which the issue must be analyzed. Part II reviews the holdings on each side of the circuit split. Part III presents the arguments that both proper statutory construction of U.S. copyright law and the legislative history of the termination right, …
The Lost Controversy Limitation Of The Federal Arbitration Act, Stephen R. Friedman
The Lost Controversy Limitation Of The Federal Arbitration Act, Stephen R. Friedman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Criminal Rules Enabling Act, Max Mizner
The Criminal Rules Enabling Act, Max Mizner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
"If The Plaintiffs Are Right, Grutter Is Wrong": Why Fisher V. University Of Texas Presents An Opportunity For The Supreme Court To Overturn A Flawed Decision, Brooks H. Spears
"If The Plaintiffs Are Right, Grutter Is Wrong": Why Fisher V. University Of Texas Presents An Opportunity For The Supreme Court To Overturn A Flawed Decision, Brooks H. Spears
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Litigating Federal Health Care Legislation And The Interstices Of Procedure, Wendy Collins Perdue
Litigating Federal Health Care Legislation And The Interstices Of Procedure, Wendy Collins Perdue
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rhetoric Hits The Road: State Challenges To The Affordable Care Act Implementation, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard
The Rhetoric Hits The Road: State Challenges To The Affordable Care Act Implementation, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sense And Severability, Tobias A. Dorsey
Sense And Severability, Tobias A. Dorsey
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reproductive Freedom And Virginia's 2012 General Assembly Session, Katherine Greenier
Reproductive Freedom And Virginia's 2012 General Assembly Session, Katherine Greenier
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
While the Governor approved H.B. 462, the mandatory ultrasound bill, H.B. 62, H.B. 1285, and S.B. 637 failed in the General Assembly.37 As introduced this 2012 session, H.B. 1 contained different bill language than the prior years it has been introduced. H.B. 62, H.B. 1285, and S.B. 637 were new bills, not seen in past years. An analysis and overview of these measures sheds light on the increasing attempts and the tactics used by legislators to undermine reproductive freedom.
Reproductive Freedom And Virginia's 2012 General Assembly Session, Katherine Greenier
Reproductive Freedom And Virginia's 2012 General Assembly Session, Katherine Greenier
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
While the Governor approved H.B. 462, the mandatory ultrasound bill, H.B. 62, H.B. 1285, and S.B. 637 failed in the General Assembly.37 As introduced this 2012 session, H.B. 1 contained different bill language than the prior years it has been introduced. H.B. 62, H.B. 1285, and S.B. 637 were new bills, not seen in past years. An analysis and overview of these measures sheds light on the increasing attempts and the tactics used by legislators to undermine reproductive freedom.