Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 14 of 14

Full-Text Articles in Law

Unconstitutional Legislation In Indiana, Oliver P. Field Dec 1941

Unconstitutional Legislation In Indiana, Oliver P. Field

Indiana Law Journal

Includes "an extensive appendix" listing all the Indiana Statutes (1916-1935) Held Unconstitutional, p.115-127.


Claims Against The State, By The Kansas Legislature Council Research Department, Frank E. Horack Dec 1941

Claims Against The State, By The Kansas Legislature Council Research Department, Frank E. Horack

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Law Revision Committee Of The State Of New York, By John W. Macdonald Dec 1941

Report Of The Law Revision Committee Of The State Of New York, By John W. Macdonald

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Indiana Legislation-1941 Dec 1941

Indiana Legislation-1941

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


List Of Indiana Statutes (1816-1935) Held Unconstitutional Dec 1941

List Of Indiana Statutes (1816-1935) Held Unconstitutional

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Congressional Enactment Of Uniform Judicial Notice Act, Lawrence E. Hartwig Dec 1941

Congressional Enactment Of Uniform Judicial Notice Act, Lawrence E. Hartwig

Michigan Law Review

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform Laws approved in 1936 the Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act, which has since been adopted by fourteen states. This act was drafted to make uniform a legislative movement of the past twelve years proposing to change two rules of the common law. One is the rule that a state court will not notice the law of sister states in the United States; and the other is the rule that the determination of such law shall be made by the jury and not by the judge. Accordingly, the Uniform Act provides (1) …


Washington Legislation—1941 (Continued), Breck P. Mcallister, Judson F. Falknor, Eugene C. Luccock, John W. Richards, Alfred Harsch, O. B. Thorgrimson, John B. Sholley Jul 1941

Washington Legislation—1941 (Continued), Breck P. Mcallister, Judson F. Falknor, Eugene C. Luccock, John W. Richards, Alfred Harsch, O. B. Thorgrimson, John B. Sholley

Washington Law Review

The survey of selected important enactments of the Twenty-Seventh Legislature of the State of Washington, first installment of which appeared in the April issue of the REVww, is continued and concluded in this issue.


Litigation Problems Under The Social Security Act, Jack B. Tate Jun 1941

Litigation Problems Under The Social Security Act, Jack B. Tate

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Evolution Of The "Duty To Bargain" Concept In American Law, Russell A. Smith May 1941

The Evolution Of The "Duty To Bargain" Concept In American Law, Russell A. Smith

Michigan Law Review

Promotion of collective bargaining appears to be a governmental policy borne of the travails of economic emergency during World War I, though it was somewhat foreshadowed by the earlier attempt in the Erdman Act of 1898 to outlaw the "yellow-dog'' contract. It first gained recognition by certain of the individual branches of the administration II and was subsequently suggested as an over-all policy, along with recognition of the right of self-organization and other principles, by the War Labor Conference Board. This board was appointed in January, 1918, by the Secretary of Labor and consisted of nominees of the National Industrial …


Washington Legislation—1941, J. Grattan O'Bryan, Leslie J. Ayer, Judson F. Falknor, Warren L. Shattuck, John B. Sholley, John W. Richards Apr 1941

Washington Legislation—1941, J. Grattan O'Bryan, Leslie J. Ayer, Judson F. Falknor, Warren L. Shattuck, John B. Sholley, John W. Richards

Washington Law Review

In undertaking to survey the work of the 1941 legislature the aim has not been to attain complete coverage. Space limitations and the time factor have dictated that only certain phases be considered and that brevity rather than complete analysis be the guide. In selecting topics for discussion the aim has been to give attention to those statutes which are likely to be of greatest concern to practicing lawyers. At the outset this meant that virtually all of the largest group of statutes, those dealing with the powers of governmental units, be eliminated. Of the remaining statutes all could not …


The Doctrine Of Judicial Review And Its Relation To A Declared Purpose Or Policy Of A Statute, Theodore S. Cox Mar 1941

The Doctrine Of Judicial Review And Its Relation To A Declared Purpose Or Policy Of A Statute, Theodore S. Cox

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Implications Of The Opp Cotton Mills Case With Respect To Procedure And Judicial Review In Administrative Rule-Making, Ralph F. Fuchs Jan 1941

Constitutional Implications Of The Opp Cotton Mills Case With Respect To Procedure And Judicial Review In Administrative Rule-Making, Ralph F. Fuchs

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


The Plans For The New Rules Of Criminal Procedure, James J. Robinson Jan 1941

The Plans For The New Rules Of Criminal Procedure, James J. Robinson

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


The Advent Of The Administrative Process And Its Future, Thomas Frank Konop Jan 1941

The Advent Of The Administrative Process And Its Future, Thomas Frank Konop

Journal Articles

Every government exercises three governmental powers E that are necessary for its existence. They are Taxation, Police Power, and the Power of Eminent Domain. Every government, however crude, or whatever we may call it, must have the power first to make the law, which is called the legislative power; second, it must have the power to declare what the law is, which is the judicial power; and third, it must have the power to enforce the law and this is called the executive power.

In the very early governments such as the government of the clan or tribe, these three …