Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal agencies (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Administrative agencies (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. (1)
-
- Chevron deference (1)
- Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense COuncil (1)
- Congress (1)
- Documents (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Freedom of Information Act (1)
- Gorsuch (Neil) (1)
- Lawmaking (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Memoirs (1)
- National Environmental Policy Act (1)
- Oversight (1)
- Permitting (1)
- Piplines (1)
- Presidents (1)
- Reed (Elizabeth Kay) (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Scenic America Inc. v. Department of Transportation (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Wilderness (1)
- Wilderness Act (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Presidential Permitting For Pipelines: Constitutionality And Reviewability, Joan Campau
Presidential Permitting For Pipelines: Constitutionality And Reviewability, Joan Campau
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
Federal oversight of cross-border pipelines occurs during the presidential permitting process. Pursuant to Executive Order 13337, the Department of State is authorized to review applications and grant permits to projects that “serve the national interest.” Scholars and litigants have questioned the constitutionality of this process and reviewability under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). This Note argues that the permitting process is constitutional and derives legitimacy from both the executive powers explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as well as an implicit sanction from the legislative branch. Further, this Note argues that APA review is appropriate for at least one component of …
How Safe Is Too Safe? Exemption 7(F) And The Withholding Of Critical Documents, Grant Snyder
How Safe Is Too Safe? Exemption 7(F) And The Withholding Of Critical Documents, Grant Snyder
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is one of the main tools used by the American public to investigate the actions of its government. Congress created FOIA in an attempt to make most government documents available to the public. Today, the FOIA process favors government withholding. This bias comes from institutional issues in courts’ review of FOIA challenges.
In the environmental and administrative law context, federal agencies use many exemptions to withhold government records from citizen and non-profit groups. Agencies that are tasked with permitting and regulating energy pipelines and other environmentally-sensitive infrastructure now regularly cite Exemption 7(F). These agencies …
Wilderness, Luck & Love: A Memoir And A Tribute, Neil Kagan
Wilderness, Luck & Love: A Memoir And A Tribute, Neil Kagan
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
In 1984, Congress preserved 8.2 million acres of roadless federal lands as "wilderness," nearly matching the acreage set aside in the Wilderness Act of 1964. Congress also created the most new wilderness areas ever in a single year, by far. Wilderness Connect, Number of Wilderness Areas Designated by Year, https://wilderness.net/practitioners/wilderness-areas/summary-reports/wilderness-areas-designated-by-year.php.
I brought two lawsuits in 1983 that proved to be the catalyst responsible for breaking the years-long impasse that had previously stymied the protection of these pristine wildlands. The lawsuits also pushed Congress to preserve more wildlands as wilderness than it would have otherwise.
This article describes the lawsuits, …
Both Sides Of The Rock: Justice Gorsuch And The Seminole Rock Deference Doctrine, Kevin O. Leske
Both Sides Of The Rock: Justice Gorsuch And The Seminole Rock Deference Doctrine, Kevin O. Leske
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
Despite being early in his tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch has already made his presence known. His October 16, 2017 statement respecting the denial of certiorari in Scenic America, Inc. v. Department of Transportation garnered significant attention within the legal community. Joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Gorsuch questioned whether the Court’s bedrock 2-part test from Chevron, U.S.A. v. NRDC—whereby courts must defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statutory term—should apply in the case.
Justice Gorsuch’s criticism of the Chevron doctrine was not a surprise. In the …