Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Preservation Ethics In The Case Of Nebraska’S Nationally Registered Historic Properties, Darren Michael Adams
Preservation Ethics In The Case Of Nebraska’S Nationally Registered Historic Properties, Darren Michael Adams
Department of Geography: Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research
This dissertation focuses on the National Register of Historic Places and considers the geographical implications of valuing particular historic sites over others. Certain historical sites will either gain or lose desirability from one era to the next, this dissertation identifies and explains three unique preservation ethical eras, and it maps the sites which were selected during those eras. These eras are the Settlement Era (1966 – 1975), the Commercial Architecture Era (1976 – 1991), and the Progressive Planning Era (1992 – 2010). The findings show that transformations in the program included an early phase when state authorities listed historical resources …
The Nebraska Transcript 43:1, Spring 2010
The Nebraska Transcript 43:1, Spring 2010
Nebraska Transcript
4 Dean’s Message
5 Poser Named Dean
10 Andy Kruse
12 Career Services Office Update
13 Law Library Tales and Tables
16 2009 Graduation Remarks
18 2009 Family Traditions Ceremony
20 In Brief
24 2008-2009 Academic Awards
26 Steve Mazurak Returns to UNL
28 Potuto Combines Teaching, Service
30 Von der Dunk: Space Law Expert
32 Faculty Notes
35 Faculty In Memoriam: Franck
36 Alum News: Larry Sather
37 2009 Alumni Council Awards
38 AlumNotes
46 In Memoriam
49 2010 Space Law LL.M. Transcript
54 Reunion Information
55 2010 Senior Transcript
79 2008-2009 Annual Donor Report
Editors Alan Frank, Professor …
The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle, Richard E. Moberly
The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle, Richard E. Moberly
Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications
In five cases issued during the last five years, the Supreme Court interpreted statutory anti-retaliation provisions broadly to protect employees who report illegal employer conduct. These decisions conflict with the typical understanding of this Court as pro-employer and judicially conservative. In a sixth retaliation decision during this time, however, the Court interpreted constitutional anti-retaliation protection narrowly, which fits with the Court’s pro-employer image but diverges from the anti-retaliation stance it appeared to take in the other five retaliation cases. This Article explains these seemingly anomalous results by examining the last fifty years of the Supreme Court’s retaliation jurisprudence. In doing …