Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (1)
- Collaborative interpretation (1)
- Conceptual interpretation (1)
- Constructivism (1)
- Crime-governance (1)
-
- Employee conduct (1)
- Explanatory interpretation (1)
- Global governance (1)
- Internal security (1)
- Law and rhetoric (1)
- Legal construction (1)
- Legal interpretation (1)
- Legal philosophy (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Moral theory (1)
- Ronald Dworkin (1)
- Transnational crime (1)
- Vague statutes (1)
- Workplace rules (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Interpretation-Construction Distinction, Lawrence B. Solum
The Interpretation-Construction Distinction, Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The interpretation-construction distinction, which marks the difference between linguistic meaning and legal effect, is much discussed these days. I shall argue that the distinction is both real and fundamental – that it marks a deep difference in two different stages (or moments) in the way that legal and political actors process legal texts. My account of the distinction will not be precisely the same as some others, but I shall argue that it is the correct account and captures the essential insights of its rivals. This Essay aims to mark the distinction clearly!
The basic idea can be explained by …
Honest-Services Fraud: A (Vague) Threat To Millions Of Blissfully Unaware (And Non-Culpable) American Workers, Julie R. O'Sullivan
Honest-Services Fraud: A (Vague) Threat To Millions Of Blissfully Unaware (And Non-Culpable) American Workers, Julie R. O'Sullivan
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The author believes that statute 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is unconstitutionally vague, at least as applied to cases in which employees of private entities are prosecuted for depriving their employers of a right to their honest services (so-called “private cases”). Objections to vagueness rest on due process. “Vagueness may invalidate a criminal law for either of two independent reasons. First, it may fail to provide the kind of notice that will enable ordinary people to understand what conduct it prohibits; second, it may authorize and even encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.” The Supreme Court’s vagueness precedents do not provide much …
The Unity Of Interpretation, Lawrence B. Solum
The Unity Of Interpretation, Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
What is interpretation? One can imagine a range of answers to this question. One answer might begin with the observation that the English word “interpretation” is used to refer to a variety of human activities. Translators at the United Nations interpret remarks made in French when they offer an English translation. Literary critics interpret novels when they investigate the deep and sometimes unconscious motivations of the author. Conductors interpret a score when they make decisions about meter, tempo, and dynamic range. Actors interpret a screenplay when they improvise new lines based on their understanding of the characters. Judges interpret statutes …
Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice, Allegra M. Mcleod
Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice, Allegra M. Mcleod
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article explores how and why, in the Cold War’s wake, the U.S. government began to export U.S.-style criminal law and procedure models to developing and politically transitioning states. U.S. criminal law and development consultants now work in countries across the globe. This article reveals how U.S. initiatives have shaped state and non-state actors’ responses to a range of global challenges, even as this approach suffers from a deep democratic deficit. Further, this article argues that U.S. programs perpetuate U.S.-style legal institutional idolatry (which is often tied to systemic dysfunction both in the United States and abroad), and in so …